BA 300 Exam Questions and Answers with
Verified Solutions | Latest Updated 2026
3 Stages of ISCT Decision-Making 1. A decision is ethical if it is compatible
with the
ethical rules of a community in which doing
business. 2. Permit members to exit when
they're in
distress about a particular norm. 3. Allows
community members a voice in influencing
the
development on the evolution of the norm.
Who shapes moral decision Peer and superiors.
The Pygmalion Effect The quality of an individual ethical respond
to a
dilemma generally reflects the
expectations
whether high or low that superiors expect
of an
individuals.
Diffusion of responsability Allows individuals to escape responsibility
for their
own actions, by putting distance between
the
individual and the consequences of their
decision
or contribution to a decision.
,Kinds of Diffusion of responsability I. Responsibility is taken away. II. Shared
with others
in decision making groups. III. Obscured
by
organization hierarchy. IV. Diluted by
psychological
distance between their victims.
Roles A firmly established role in an organization
may
reduce an individual's sense of his or her
own
responsibility for a given ethically related
action.
Deindividuation Is the process of which an individual
minimizes his
or her personal responsibility on an action
by
focusing on his or her assigned role. In
other words
you are only fulfilling the function the
organization
gave you to fulfill.
Zimbardo prison experiment Study involving 24 healthy subjects given
the role
of prison guards or inmates. The people
assigned
to be guards became hostile and
aggressive, those
assigned to be prisoners generally felt
hopeless
and victimized.
,Business Law Reflecting society's minimum norms and
standards
of business conduct.
BIGGEST EFFECT: the dramatic increase
of in-house
ethics to ensure compliance with internal
and
external company laws
The Domain of Ethics Includes the law but extends beyond it to
include
the ethical standards and issues that the
law does
not address.
Corporate Rules / Internal Rules These rules exceed the minimum
requirements of
state imposed law. They also shape ethical
decision
inside an organization every bit as much
as laws on
the books.
The Fair Employement and California and Federal Law prohibit
Housing discrimination
Act. (cali law) / Tittle 7 (Federal in employment based on race, gender,
law) religion,
and other characteristics.
, Federal Organizational Sentencing Business cannot be imprisoned if
Guidelines convicted of a
crime but they can be fined. In 1991 in
response to
corporate scandals the federal government
established guidelines for judges to use in
sentencing business and other
organizations
ultimately convicted of crime, such as
defrauding
the government, bribery or other offences.
The key
in determining the organization's criminal
sentence,
the amount of the fine the business would
have to
pay the government for its ethical
misconduct is its
CULPABILITY SCORE from 0 - 10 starting
at 5.
critiques of Federal Organizational 1. does nothing to help employees defend
Sentencing Guidelines themselves
2. prevents business from performing a
good
investigation of its employees
3. prevents corporations from turn the
results of
investigation into the government
Verified Solutions | Latest Updated 2026
3 Stages of ISCT Decision-Making 1. A decision is ethical if it is compatible
with the
ethical rules of a community in which doing
business. 2. Permit members to exit when
they're in
distress about a particular norm. 3. Allows
community members a voice in influencing
the
development on the evolution of the norm.
Who shapes moral decision Peer and superiors.
The Pygmalion Effect The quality of an individual ethical respond
to a
dilemma generally reflects the
expectations
whether high or low that superiors expect
of an
individuals.
Diffusion of responsability Allows individuals to escape responsibility
for their
own actions, by putting distance between
the
individual and the consequences of their
decision
or contribution to a decision.
,Kinds of Diffusion of responsability I. Responsibility is taken away. II. Shared
with others
in decision making groups. III. Obscured
by
organization hierarchy. IV. Diluted by
psychological
distance between their victims.
Roles A firmly established role in an organization
may
reduce an individual's sense of his or her
own
responsibility for a given ethically related
action.
Deindividuation Is the process of which an individual
minimizes his
or her personal responsibility on an action
by
focusing on his or her assigned role. In
other words
you are only fulfilling the function the
organization
gave you to fulfill.
Zimbardo prison experiment Study involving 24 healthy subjects given
the role
of prison guards or inmates. The people
assigned
to be guards became hostile and
aggressive, those
assigned to be prisoners generally felt
hopeless
and victimized.
,Business Law Reflecting society's minimum norms and
standards
of business conduct.
BIGGEST EFFECT: the dramatic increase
of in-house
ethics to ensure compliance with internal
and
external company laws
The Domain of Ethics Includes the law but extends beyond it to
include
the ethical standards and issues that the
law does
not address.
Corporate Rules / Internal Rules These rules exceed the minimum
requirements of
state imposed law. They also shape ethical
decision
inside an organization every bit as much
as laws on
the books.
The Fair Employement and California and Federal Law prohibit
Housing discrimination
Act. (cali law) / Tittle 7 (Federal in employment based on race, gender,
law) religion,
and other characteristics.
, Federal Organizational Sentencing Business cannot be imprisoned if
Guidelines convicted of a
crime but they can be fined. In 1991 in
response to
corporate scandals the federal government
established guidelines for judges to use in
sentencing business and other
organizations
ultimately convicted of crime, such as
defrauding
the government, bribery or other offences.
The key
in determining the organization's criminal
sentence,
the amount of the fine the business would
have to
pay the government for its ethical
misconduct is its
CULPABILITY SCORE from 0 - 10 starting
at 5.
critiques of Federal Organizational 1. does nothing to help employees defend
Sentencing Guidelines themselves
2. prevents business from performing a
good
investigation of its employees
3. prevents corporations from turn the
results of
investigation into the government
