Type of Study: Scoping review
(qualitative study)
Level of evidence: Level V. Above:
narrative reviews, expert opinion,
and single descriptive studies.
Below: systematic reviews with
meta-analysis and randomized
controlled trials (RCTs).
Methodology: scoping review
guided by the Arksey and O’Malley
framework and reported according
to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Credibility Factors:
Published in a credible peer
reviewed journal
The research is recent and
the upload date is present
The DOI is available for
easy access to the article
Original Article: Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes
Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review
(qualitative study)
Level of evidence: Level V. Above:
narrative reviews, expert opinion,
and single descriptive studies.
Below: systematic reviews with
meta-analysis and randomized
controlled trials (RCTs).
Methodology: scoping review
guided by the Arksey and O’Malley
framework and reported according
to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Credibility Factors:
Published in a credible peer
reviewed journal
The research is recent and
the upload date is present
The DOI is available for
easy access to the article
Original Article: Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes
Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review
