Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

NR505NP Week 7: Recommendation for an Evidence-Based Practice Change PowerPoint Kaltura Presentation – Answered Assignment (2025/2026 Update)

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
15
Grado
A+
Subido en
31-05-2026
Escrito en
2025/2026

This document contains a completed NR505NP Week 7 assignment focused on recommending an evidence-based practice change through a PowerPoint Kaltura presentation. It covers key concepts such as evidence-based practice implementation, research appraisal, clinical problem identification, practice change recommendations, stakeholder engagement, and outcome evaluation in advanced nursing practice. The material is designed to help nursing students understand the process of translating research into practice and effectively communicating evidence-based recommendations. It is useful for assignment preparation, course review, and strengthening knowledge of quality improvement and evidence-based healthcare initiatives.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
NR505NP
Grado
NR505NP

Vista previa del contenido

NR505NP WEEK 7: RECOMMENDATION
FOR AN EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE
CHANGE POWERPOINT KALTURA
PRESENTATION (ANSWERED) LATEST
2025/2026 UPDATE!!

SECTION 1: PICOT QUESTION FORMATION & EVIDENCE LEVELS (Questions 1–5)



Q1: A DNP student wants to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) in a
medical-surgical unit. Which PICOT question contains all required elements correctly
structured?

A. In hospitalized adults, does chlorhexidine bathing compared to standard soap reduce CAUTI
rates within 30 days?

B. Does chlorhexidine bathing reduce infections in hospitals?

C. In adults, how does chlorhexidine compare to soap for reducing CAUTI?

D. Among hospitalized patients, is chlorhexidine bathing effective?

Correct Answer: A

Rationale: Correct because this PICOT includes Population (hospitalized adults), Intervention
(chlorhexidine bathing), Comparison (standard soap), Outcome (CAUTI rates), and Time (within
30 days). Option B lacks comparison, outcome specificity, and time. Option C lacks a defined
population and time frame. Option D lacks comparison, specific outcome measurement, and
time. Priority is ensuring all five PICOT elements are present and precisely defined for literature
search feasibility.



Q2: A DNP student is evaluating evidence for a systematic review on nurse-led heart failure
education. According to the evidence pyramid, which source represents the highest level of
evidence?

A. A single randomized controlled trial (RCT) published in a peer-reviewed journal

, B. A systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis published by the Cochrane Collaboration

C. An expert opinion column written by a cardiology nurse practitioner

D. A qualitative phenomenological study exploring patient experiences with heart failure

Correct Answer: B

Rationale: Correct because a systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis represents Level I
evidence, the apex of the evidence pyramid. This matches the hierarchy where synthesized
evidence from multiple well-designed RCTs provides the strongest foundation for EBP
recommendations. Option A represents Level II evidence (single RCT). Option C represents Level
VII evidence (expert opinion). Option D represents Level VI evidence (single descriptive or
qualitative study). Priority is selecting the highest available evidence level for clinical decision-
making.



Q3: A DNP student is formulating a PICOT question for an EBP change project focused on
reducing 30-day readmission rates among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD). Which element is MISSING from the following PICOT statement: "In adults with COPD
(P), does a telehealth monitoring program (I) compared to standard discharge instructions (C)
reduce 30-day hospital readmissions (O)?"

A. Intervention specificity

B. Comparison clarity

C. Time frame

D. Outcome measurability

Correct Answer: C

Rationale: Correct because the PICOT statement as written lacks a defined Time element. While
the outcome mentions "30-day readmissions," the time frame for the EBP initiative
implementation and evaluation is not specified. This matches the requirement that Time in
PICOT refers to the duration of the intervention or the target date of completion, not merely the
outcome measurement window. Option A is incorrect because the intervention (telehealth
monitoring program) is sufficiently specific. Option B is incorrect because standard discharge
instructions provide a clear comparison. Option D is incorrect because 30-day readmissions is a
measurable outcome. Priority is ensuring all five PICOT components are explicitly articulated.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
NR505NP
Grado
NR505NP

Información del documento

Subido en
31 de mayo de 2026
Número de páginas
15
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$13.99
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
ExamAceStuvia Rasmussen College
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
38
Miembro desde
10 meses
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
963
Última venta
1 semana hace
Top Grades By ExamAceStuvia

Ace Your Certification — The Smart Way! Welcome to ExamAceStuvia – the ultimate battle-tested exam prep platform built by passers, for future passers. Get thousands of real exam questions straight from people who just crushed the same test you’re facing. No fluff. No outdated dumps. Just authentic, up-to-date practice that feels exactly like the real thing. Why thousands choose Examice every day: 400+ published exams across 100+ top providers (AWS, Microsoft, Cisco, ,NCLEX , WGU , CompTIA, and many more) Whether you're preparing for nursing licensure (NCLEX, ATI, HESI, ANCC, AANP), healthcare certifications (ACLS, BLS, PALS, PMHNP, AGNP), standardized tests (TEAS, HESI, PAX, NLN), or university-specific exams (WGU, Portage Learning, Georgia Tech, and more), our documents are 100% correct, up-to-date for 2025/2026, and reviewed for accuracy.. Community-powered accuracy → open discussions, source-backed references, democratic voting & follow-up Q&A to lock in the real correct answers Realistic exam that builds confidence and exposes weak spots fast Most affordable premium prep in the industry – quality without breaking the bank Regular updates so you’re always studying what actually appears today Whether you're chasing that dream job, promotion, or career switch — ExamAce turns “I hope I pass” into “I’ve got this.” Join the community that’s already helped thousands certify. Try ExamAceStuvia today → pass tomorrow.

Lee mas Leer menos
3.9

7 reseñas

5
4
4
0
3
2
2
0
1
1

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes