Justin Cobb
Analyzing Bias in Aviation Safety Reporting: A Mixed-Methods Approach
ASCI 604 Human Factors
Dr. Breuer
Abstract
, “This study examines bias in aviation safety reporting and the
reporting system associated with the NTSB, identify main factors can affect
the reporting and analysis of safety incidents/accidents. Using the mixed-
methods approach, the research paper will involve quantitative analysis of
safety reporting databases with qualitative interviews and experiences from
several aviation professionals. There will be two primary sources of
information: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) incident
reports and self-reported examples from aviation professionals. This
research paper will point out examples of underreporting and flawed
narratives that could be influenced by socio-economic factors, organization
culture, and vague interpretation of regulations. This research paper will
also compare the frequency of incident reporting at smaller carrier
operations compared to larger Part 121 operations. FAA Regulations are
more restrictive for larger carriers in comparison to Part 135/91 operations.
Another area to be examined is certain demographic group in the aviation
industry are less likely to report minor safety concerns, such as general
aviation, possibly due to perceived repercussions or cultural stigma. An
example of this would be the lack of minor safety reporting at flight clubs
and smaller Part 61 flight schools. This research paper will provide a
valuable outlook towards systematic biases in safety reporting and suggest
different solutions to a more systematic reporting system in aviation that
can be more efficient, transparent, and accountable reporting culture in
aviation.” (Cobb)
Analyzing Bias in Aviation Safety Reporting: A Mixed-Methods Approach
ASCI 604 Human Factors
Dr. Breuer
Abstract
, “This study examines bias in aviation safety reporting and the
reporting system associated with the NTSB, identify main factors can affect
the reporting and analysis of safety incidents/accidents. Using the mixed-
methods approach, the research paper will involve quantitative analysis of
safety reporting databases with qualitative interviews and experiences from
several aviation professionals. There will be two primary sources of
information: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) incident
reports and self-reported examples from aviation professionals. This
research paper will point out examples of underreporting and flawed
narratives that could be influenced by socio-economic factors, organization
culture, and vague interpretation of regulations. This research paper will
also compare the frequency of incident reporting at smaller carrier
operations compared to larger Part 121 operations. FAA Regulations are
more restrictive for larger carriers in comparison to Part 135/91 operations.
Another area to be examined is certain demographic group in the aviation
industry are less likely to report minor safety concerns, such as general
aviation, possibly due to perceived repercussions or cultural stigma. An
example of this would be the lack of minor safety reporting at flight clubs
and smaller Part 61 flight schools. This research paper will provide a
valuable outlook towards systematic biases in safety reporting and suggest
different solutions to a more systematic reporting system in aviation that
can be more efficient, transparent, and accountable reporting culture in
aviation.” (Cobb)
