Points: 75
Submission #1: Graded on Dec 10 at 00:08
Submission Score Submit Time Grade Time
(88.00%) Dec 10 at 00:08 Dec 10 at 00:08
1
Rebekah is not liable because she had no illegal intent
Rebekah is liable even though she had no illegal intent
Rebekah is liable only if she was found to be negligent in not recognizing
the marijuana
Rebekah is not liable if someone else was witnessed planting the
marijuana
FEEDBACK
(100.0%)
2
Mistake of Fact
Involuntary Intoxication
Duress
FEEDBACK
(100.0%)
3
Felony
Misdemeanor
Capital Crime
, Infraction
FEEDBACK
4
Nukere cannot be held liable because anyone living nearby assumes the
risk of hazardous waste toxicity.
NuKere cannot be held liable, as it just passed a strict set of safety checks.
NuKere can be held liable only if there is concrete physical evidence of
harm to people or property.
FEEDBACK
5
Eduardo is being defamatory because the information he published is
most likely true.
Eduardo is not being defamatory because it is obvious that the statement
must be false.
Eduardo is not being defamatory because his remarks are statements of
opinion only.
opponent’s reputation.
FEEDBACK
6
Submission #1: Graded on Dec 10 at 00:08
Submission Score Submit Time Grade Time
(88.00%) Dec 10 at 00:08 Dec 10 at 00:08
1
Rebekah is not liable because she had no illegal intent
Rebekah is liable even though she had no illegal intent
Rebekah is liable only if she was found to be negligent in not recognizing
the marijuana
Rebekah is not liable if someone else was witnessed planting the
marijuana
FEEDBACK
(100.0%)
2
Mistake of Fact
Involuntary Intoxication
Duress
FEEDBACK
(100.0%)
3
Felony
Misdemeanor
Capital Crime
, Infraction
FEEDBACK
4
Nukere cannot be held liable because anyone living nearby assumes the
risk of hazardous waste toxicity.
NuKere cannot be held liable, as it just passed a strict set of safety checks.
NuKere can be held liable only if there is concrete physical evidence of
harm to people or property.
FEEDBACK
5
Eduardo is being defamatory because the information he published is
most likely true.
Eduardo is not being defamatory because it is obvious that the statement
must be false.
Eduardo is not being defamatory because his remarks are statements of
opinion only.
opponent’s reputation.
FEEDBACK
6
