Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 8 páginas
Examen

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 (232431)- DUE 14 August 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Vista previa 2 fuera de 8 páginas

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 (232431)- DUE 14 August 2026; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... Ensure your success with us...... 1. BACKGROUND FACTS In assignment 1, one of the questions was: “In January 2026 Patrice Motsepe's net worth was estimated to be US$ 4.2 billion." My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this. b. The only problem I have with this is that it wasn’t me with US$ 4.2 billion! c. No problem with this. I'm sure Motsepe gives huge amounts to charities. d. I think that it is morally wrong for anyone to have that much money. e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoral wealth. This is a huge amount of money – over R 70 billion. Just putting this in a bank account at 5% interest would yield R 3.5 billion rand income every year! R 3.5 billion!! Every year!! Do you remember which option you chose? In this assignment we are going to zoom in on option “a” specifically: “Good for him – he worked hard to earn this”. What this option is basically saying is, that the wealth of billionaires like Motsepe are completely reasonable and justifiable? What we want you to do in this assignment is to examine this option (i.e. someone, perhaps even you, having US$ 4.2 billion) from the perspective of Kant’s formula of universal law version of the categorical imperative. 2. EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (We've done the first two stages for you) 1. State your proposed act as a maxim: "Patrice Motsepe will accumulate US$ 4.2 billion (A) over the course of his life (C) in order to get really, really rich (E)." 2. Restate this maxim as a universal law: "All people (8.1 billion of them) will accumulate US$ 4.2 billion over the course of their life in order to get really, really rich." 3. Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal law; COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 4. Would you rationally act on the maxim above in such a world. COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 3. FORM AN OPINION On the basis of your analysis above, answer the following questions: 1. What would Kant probably have said about Motsepe’s wealth? COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 2. Why do you think this? You MUST state your premises (reasons) explicitly as we taught you in the section on arguments (A DARN GOOD ARGUMENT - INFORMAL LOGIC). If you do not do this, you will not pass this assignment. COMPULSORY - minimum of 200 words Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 3. What do you think about Patrice Motsepe’s wealth? COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 4. Why do you think this? COMPULSORY - minimum of 200 words Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here.

Vista previa del contenido

SUS1501
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026
Unique number: 232431
Due date: 14 August 2026

Assignment 02

SUS1501 – Sustainability and Greed

Student Number:
Date:
Teaching Assistant Name:

Declaration:

By submitting this assignment, I implicitly declare that this is my own work.

I am aware that if ANY unacknowledged copying or AI usage is detected in ANY part of
this assignment, I will get 0 (zero) for the entire assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:


In this assignment you will submit two answers to each question. The first will be the

, Assignment 02

SUS1501 – Sustainability and Greed

Student Number:
Date:
Teaching Assistant Name:

Declaration:

By submitting this assignment, I implicitly declare that this is my own work.

I am aware that if ANY unacknowledged copying or AI usage is detected in ANY part of this
assignment, I will get 0 (zero) for the entire assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:


In this assignment you will submit two answers to each question. The first will be the
answers IN YOUR OWN WORDS.


 Read the background facts.
 Fill in your assignment contributions under the relevant headings in your own words
in the space provided.
 Use any AI engine to edit your original submissions and fill these in the space
provided.
 Save the file as a Word document with a short name (myUnisa will reject files with
long names);
 Submit this file into the Assessment 2 assignment space on myUnisa;
 Take a screen grab of the final submission acknowledgement on myUnisa and save
this somewhere safe in case of any disputes:
 Check under the Assignments tool that there is a date in the “Processed” cell for the
SUS1501 Assignment 2.
 DO NOT DELETE THE TEMPLATE CONTENT TO REDUCE YOUR TURNITIN SCORE


1. BACKGROUND FACTS


In assignment 1, one of the questions was:

Libro relacionado
 image
Lucas Andrianos, Guillermo Kerber, Jan-Willem Sneep Sustainable Alternatives for Poverty Reduction and Eco-Justice
Editorial: 2014 ISBN: 9781443870252 Edición: Desconocido

Información del documento

Subido en
13 de marzo de 2026
Archivo actualizado en
9 de agosto de 2026
Número de páginas
8
Escrito en
2026/2027
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$4.77
Comprado por 15 estudiantes

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
EduPal
4.2
(14312)
Vendido
153712
Seguidores
36023
Artículos
5086
Última venta
1 hora hace

Reseñas de compradores verificados



Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes