Complete Study Guide.
This document provides a comprehensive collection of CPR3701 exam questions and well-explained answers
designed to help students prepare effectively for their assessments and final examinations.
The material focuses on important programming and computer science concepts, helping students understand key
topics and practice answering exam-style questions. Each answer is carefully explained to support better understanding
and improve problem-solving skills.
This study guide includes:
✔ CPR3701 exam-style practice questions
✔ Detailed explanations and solutions
✔ Important programming concepts and key topics
✔ Revision material for exam preparation
This resource is ideal for students looking to review key concepts, test their knowledge, and improve their
performance in the CPR3701 examination.
Perfect for quick revision and effective exam preparation.
1
,rue or False: Under Terry, when the offense under TRUE
investigation is a recent crime committed with the
aid of a firearm, police will always have frisk
authority so long as they have stop authority.
True or False: Under Terry, when the offense FALSE
under investigation is a nonviolent offense such as
sale of marijuana, the police will never have frisk
authority even when they have stop authority.
The Supreme Court often changes Fourth NO
Amendment law. Sometimes these changes
impose new limits on the police, as when the
Court ruled last summer that police need a search
warrant to obtain the suspect's location data from
his cell phone provider. Now consider the
situation where the police obtained the location
data without a warrant, before the Supreme Court
decision ruled that they needed one, but the
suppression motion is heard after the new
Supreme Court decision. If the courts focus
exclusivley on deterring Fourth Amendment
violations, should the court grant the motion?
The Supreme Court often changes Fourth YES
Amendment law. Sometimes these changes
impose new limits on the police, as when the
Court ruled last summer that police need a search
warrant to obtain the suspect's location data from
his cell phone provider. Now consider the
situation where the police obtained the location
data without a warrant, before the Supreme Court
decision ruled that they needed one, but the
suppression motion is heard after the new
Supreme Court decision. suppose the courts focus
primarily on judicial integrity and compelled-self
incrimination when they apply the exclusionary
rule.
Should the court grant the motion?
After a traffic stop, police arrest the driver, S, on No Warrant
an outstanding warrant for domestic battery. A
search of S's person discovered a pistol, a bag
containing a dozen rocks of crack cocaine (a small
but commercial rather than
recreational quantity) and $1700 in cash. S is now
handcuffed and locked in a police car. The officers
want to know if they can search the glove
compartment without a warrant.
After a traffic stop, police arrest the driver, S, on No Warrant
an outstanding warrant for domestic battery. A
search of S's person discovered a pistol, a bag
containing a dozen rocks of crack cocaine (a small
but commercial rather than
recreational quantity) and $1700 in cash. S is now
handcuffed and locked in a police car. The officers
want to know if they can search the trunk without
2
, a warrant.
Police officers responsible for security at a No Warrant
public high school ask if they can lead a drug
sniffing dog by cars parked in the student
parking lot.
The officers want to know if they can lead the dog No Warrant
by the student lockers inside the building.
Police have developed probable cause to believe S No Warrant
is operating a meth lab somewhere on his 40 acre
farm. They want to know if they can inspect the
farm without a warrant
Police on routine patrol in a high crime neighborhood hear No Warrant
what could have been a gun shot from inside a house at
1234 Crime Street. They want to know if they can enter
without a warrant.
Police on routine patrol in a high crime neighborhood hear Warrant
what could have been a gun shot from inside a house at
1234 Crime Street. Suppose that while the police are still
on the phone with you, an apparent resident opens the
door and shouts for the police to come in. They hang up,
enter, and find a gun shot victim. After securing the
premises, finding no strangers or weapons, and having
called for emts and back up police units, they call you
back. The victim and the victim's roommate give police a
description of the shooter, who fled on foot. Back up police
establish a surveillance perimeter outside the area they
estimate the shooter might have reached in the minutes
since the shot rang out. The officers want to know if they
may search for the shooter, without a warrant, in each of
the buildings inside the perimeter.
Police have a warrant to arrest S on a charge of being a Warrant
felon in possession of a firearm. They enter S's apartment
and find him on a couch, passed out, apparently drunk.
They take him into custody and call you after he is locked
in a police car but while some officers are still inside the
apartment. They ask you if they can search the apartment
for the gun without a search warrant.
Police believe that S is operating a drug operation out of Warrant
his home. S has three children. An officer has suggested
planting a microphone in the latest model video game
controller, giving it to the kids, with the hope that they will
carry it inside, permitting police to listen on what is going
on in the home. They call you and ask if they need a
warrant for this operation.
3