Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025 MARK SCHEME PAPER 2: Biological Diversity [OCR 11420/021

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
74
Grado
A+
Subido en
11-03-2026
Escrito en
2025/2026

A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025 MARK SCHEME PAPER 2: Biological Diversity [OCR 11420/021 Exam Resource Summary The A Level Biology A June 2025 Biological Diversity Mark Scheme (OCR H420/02) provides the official, detailed marking guidance used by examiners to assess student performance on the Biological Diversity paper. This document outlines the precise criteria for awarding marks, including required scientific terminology, key points for full-credit explanations, data-analysis expectations, and the structure of high-band responses across all question types. By clearly defining acceptable answers, common misconceptions, and how marks are allocated, the mark scheme enables students to understand examiner expectations and refine their exam technique. This resource is an essential companion for targeted revision, helping learners evaluate their own practice responses, strengthen biological reasoning, and build the accuracy and detail needed for success in the May/June 2026 OCR A Level Biology A Biological Diversity examination.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025
Grado
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025

Vista previa del contenido

Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

,OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing a wide range of qualifications
to meet the needs of candidates of all ages and abilities. OCR qualifications include AS/A Levels,
Diplomas, GCSEs, Cambridge Nationals, Cambridge Technicals, Functional Skills, Key Skills, Entry Level
qualifications, NVQs and vocational qualifications in areas such as IT, business, languages,
teaching/training, administration and secretarial skills.

It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the needs of
students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is invested back into the
establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and support, which keep pace with the
changing needs of today’s society.

This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking commenced.

All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in candidates’
scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills demonstrated.

Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report on the
examination.


© OCR 2025




Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

,H420/02 Mark Scheme June 2025
MARKING INSTRUCTIONS
PREPARATION FOR MARKING RM
ASSESSOR
1. Make sure that you have accessed and completed the relevant training packages for on-screen marking: RM Assessor Online Training: OCR Essential Guide
to Marking.

2. Make sure that you have read and understood the mark scheme and the question paper for this unit. These are available in RM Assessor



3. Log-in to RM Assessor and mark the required number of practice responses (“scripts”) and the required number of standardisation responses.


MARKING
1. Mark strictly to the mark scheme.

2. Marks awarded must relate directly to the marking criteria.

3. The schedule of dates is very important. It is essential that you meet the RM Assessor 50% and 100% (traditional 40% Batch 1 and 100% Batch 2) deadlines. If
you experience problems, you must contact your Team Leader (Supervisor) without delay.

4. If you are in any doubt about applying the mark scheme, consult your Team Leader by telephone, email or via the RM Assessor messaging system.

5. Crossed-Out Responses
Where a candidate has crossed out a response and provided a clear alternative then the crossed-out response is not marked. Where no alternative response has
been provided, examiners may give candidates the benefit of the doubt and mark the crossed-out response where legible.

Rubric Error Responses – Optional Questions
Where candidates have a choice of question across a whole paper or a whole section and have provided more answers than required, then all responses are marked
and the highest mark allowable within the rubric is given. Enter a mark for each question answered into RM Assessor, which will select the highest mark from those
awarded. (The underlying assumption is that the candidate has penalised themselves by attempting more questions than necessary in the time allowed.)


2

, H420/02 Mark Scheme June 2025
Multiple-Choice Question Responses
When a multiple-choice question has only a single, correct response and a candidate provides two responses (even if one of these responses is correct), then no mark
should be awarded (as it is not possible to determine which was the first response selected by the candidate).
When a question requires candidates to select more than one option/multiple options, then local marking arrangements need to ensure consistency of approach.

Contradictory Responses
When a candidate provides contradictory responses, then no mark should be awarded, even if one of the answers is correct.

Short Answer Questions (requiring only a list by way of a response, usually worth only one mark per response)
Where candidates are required to provide a set number of short answer responses then only the set number of responses should be marked. The response space
should be marked from left to right on each line and then line by line until the required number of responses have been considered. The remaining responses should
not then be marked. Examiners will have to apply judgement as to whether a ‘second response’ on a line is a development of the ‘first response’, rather than a
separate, discrete response. (The underlying assumption is that the candidate is attempting to hedge their bets and therefore getting undue benefit rather than
engaging with the question and giving the most relevant/correct responses.)

Short Answer Questions (requiring a more developed response, worth two or more marks)
If the candidates are required to provide a description of, say, three items or factors and four items or factors are provided, then mark on a similar basis – that is
downwards (as it is unlikely in this situation that a candidate will provide more than one response in each section of the response space).

Longer Answer Questions (requiring a developed response)
Where candidates have provided two (or more) responses to a medium or high tariff question which only required a single (developed) response and not crossed
out the first response, then only the first response should be marked. Examiners will need to apply professional judgement as to whether the second (or a
subsequent) response is a ‘new start’ or simply a poorly expressed continuation of the first response.

6. Always check the pages (and additional objects if present) at the end of the response in case any answers have been continued there. If the candidate has
continued an answer there, then add the annotation ‘SEEN’ to confirm that the work has been seen and mark any responses using the annotations in section 11.




3

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025
Grado
A LEVEL BIOLOGY A: Actual June 2025

Información del documento

Subido en
11 de marzo de 2026
Número de páginas
74
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$9.99
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Cate001 Walden university
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
179
Miembro desde
3 año
Número de seguidores
78
Documentos
1887
Última venta
3 semanas hace

4.9

419 reseñas

5
398
4
12
3
5
2
1
1
3

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes