Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

RRLLB81 Assignment 3 PORTFOLIO (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - Organised crime, forfeiture of criminal proceeds and the concept of instrumentality

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
24
Grado
A+
Subido en
10-03-2026
Escrito en
2025/2026

RRLLB81 Assignment 3 PORTFOLIO (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references. ORGANISED CRIME, FORFEITURE OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDS AND THE CONCEPT OF INSTRUMENTALITY Background The most useful technique in combating organised crime is not only to capture and convict the outlaws, but also to deprive criminals the proceeds of unlawful activities. This may include the forfeiture of the proceeds of crime, and the confiscation of certain properties. The Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA) 121 of 1998 was introduced by the Legislature inter alia to provide for a civil remedy for the preservation and seizure, and forfeiture of property which is derived from unlawful activities or is concerned in the commission or suspected commission of an offence. Strictly speaking, not only the express proceeds of crime may be confiscated. Section 38 empowers the court to make ‘preservation of property orders’ if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the property concerned (a) is an instrumentality of an offence referred to in Schedule 1; or (b) is the proceeds of unlawful activities. In other words, property may be confiscated which, even though it is not directly implicated in the commission of the offence, nonetheless, forms an integral component of the offence. The property is labelled an instrumentality of the crime, thus subject to forfeiture, mainly to deprive the criminal further use of the property to commit crime. This could be an appropriate method that could hinder criminal activities. Conduct research and investigate why the concept of instrumentality and/or forfeiture of criminal proceeds are useful for law enforcement. Equally investigate whether one or two of these legal tools is bad law and unreasonably deprive people of their property. Strictly speaking, not only the express proceeds of crime may be confiscated. Section 38 empowers the court to make ‘preservation of property orders’ if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the property concerned (a) is an instrumentality of an offence referred to in Schedule 1; or (b) is the proceeds of unlawful activities. In other words, property may be confiscated which, even though it is not directly implicated in the commission of the offence, nonetheless, forms an integral component of the offence. The property is labelled an instrumentality of the Downloaded by Pied Zulu () lOMoARcPSD| RRLLB81/103/1/2026 59 crime, thus subject to forfeiture, to deprive the criminal further use of the property to commit crime. This could be an appropriate method that could hinder criminal activities. Conduct research and investigate why the concept of instrumentality and/or forfeiture of criminal proceeds are useful for law enforcement. Equally investigate whether one or two of these legal tools is bad law and unreasonably deprive people of their property. Cases National Director of Public Prosecutions v RO Cook Properties (Pty) Ltd; National Director of Public Prosecutions v 37 Gillespie Street Durban (Pty) Ltd; National Director of Public Prosecutions v Seevnarayan [2004] 2 All SA 491 (SCA) Prophet v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2007 (6) SA 169 (CC) Books Kruger A, Organised Crime and Proceeds of Crime Law in South Africa (2nd edn, LexisNexis 2013) Von Lampe K, Organized Crime: Analyzing Illegal Activities, Criminal Structures and Extra-Legal Governance (Sage 2015) Legislation Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992 Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 Journal Articles Basdeo V, ‘The Law and Practice of Criminal Asset Forfeiture in South African Criminal Procedure: A Constitutional Dilemma’ (2014) 17 PELJ 1048 Nkoane P, ‘The Prevention of Organised Crime Act: The Proving of “Instrumentality” in Cases of Obscured Use of Intangible Things’ (2016) 27 Stell LR 182

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado

Vista previa del contenido

RRLLB81
Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026
RESEARCH REPORT
Due Date: April 2026

Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.


+27 81 278 3372

, Organised crime, forfeiture of criminal proceeds and the concept of
instrumentality

By



[RRLLB81 STUDENT]

(012345678)

Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree



BACHELOR OF LAWS

in the



DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL AND PROCEDURAL LAW

SCHOOL OF LAW

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA




SUPERVISOR: PROF MM MONYAKANE



RRLLB81 ASSESSMENT 2 / FINAL PORTFOLIO

(DUE DATE: April 2026)




Varsity Cube 2026 +27 81 278 3372

, Abstract

This research examines the role of asset forfeiture and the concept of instrumentality
in combating organised crime in South Africa, particularly under the Prevention of
Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (POCA). Organised crime often generates
significant financial benefits, allowing criminal networks to expand and sustain
unlawful activities. POCA introduced civil forfeiture mechanisms that allow the state
to seize property used in the commission of crimes or obtained through unlawful
activities. This study investigates the usefulness of these legal tools for law
enforcement and considers whether they may infringe on constitutional property
rights. The research analyses relevant legislation, case law and academic
commentary, including National Director of Public Prosecutions v RO Cook
Properties and Prophet v NDPP. The findings suggest that asset forfeiture is a
powerful tool for disrupting organised crime networks. However, concerns remain
regarding proportionality, due process and the potential risk of unjust deprivation of
property.




Varsity Cube 2026 +27 81 278 3372

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
10 de marzo de 2026
Número de páginas
24
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$4.59
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
VarsityC AAA School of Advertising
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
29073
Miembro desde
8 año
Número de seguidores
13262
Documentos
3385
Última venta
9 horas hace

4.1

2891 reseñas

5
1531
4
590
3
403
2
122
1
245

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes