Assignment 2 Semester 1 2026
RESEARCH REPORT
Due Date: April 2026
Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.
+27 81 278 3372
, Interpretation of statutes: is textual interpretation of statute more useful than
contextual interpretation?
By
[RRLLB81 STUDENT]
(012345678)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
BACHELOR OF LAWS
in the
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL AND PROCEDURAL LAW
SCHOOL OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
SUPERVISOR: PROF MM MONYAKANE
RRLLB81 ASSESSMENT 2 / FINAL PORTFOLIO
(DUE DATE: April 2026)
Varsity Cube 2026 +27 81 278 3372
, Abstract
This research examines whether textual interpretation or contextual interpretation of
statutes is better suited to the South African legal system. Traditionally, courts relied
on textual interpretation, which focuses on the literal meaning of statutory words to
determine the intention of the legislature. However, South Africa’s constitutional
democracy has shifted interpretative approaches toward contextual and purposive
interpretation. This study analyses statutory interpretation within the framework of
the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, relevant legislation, and key
judicial decisions. Cases such as Jaga v Donges, Engels v Allied Chemical
Manufacturers (Pty) Ltd, and Minister of Land Affairs v Slamdien illustrate how courts
consider both textual wording and broader context when interpreting statutes. The
research finds that contextual interpretation is generally more appropriate in South
Africa because it aligns legislation with constitutional values, promotes justice, and
ensures that statutes are interpreted within their social and historical context. The
study concludes that while textual interpretation remains important, contextual
interpretation better supports constitutional supremacy and the protection of
fundamental rights.
Varsity Cube 2026 +27 81 278 3372