TPS3704
Assignment 2 2026
Unique number:
Due date: 2026
QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One clear ethical concern in this situation is the teacher’s public statement that learners
who do not submit their work show a lack of discipline and commitment. Even though
Lerato’s name was not mentioned, it was obvious to the class who the comment was
about. This led to embarrassment and teasing from other learners. A teacher carries the
responsibility of creating a classroom space where every learner feels respected and
valued. When a learner is indirectly singled out in front of peers, it can damage their
confidence and emotional wellbeing.
In this case, the teacher did not take time to understand Lerato’s background or the
challenges she faces at home. Instead of asking questions or offering support, the teacher
assumed that her incomplete work was a result of poor attitude. This response shows a
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen
as a replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged
to perform their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific
assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the
information in these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content.
The buyer is responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when
applying it to their assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's
policies regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and
sources of inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may
be considered academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences
arising from the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or
any other negative consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One clear ethical concern in this situation is the teacher’s public statement that
learners who do not submit their work show a lack of discipline and commitment.
Even though Lerato’s name was not mentioned, it was obvious to the class who the
comment was about. This led to embarrassment and teasing from other learners. A
teacher carries the responsibility of creating a classroom space where every learner
feels respected and valued. When a learner is indirectly singled out in front of peers,
it can damage their confidence and emotional wellbeing.
In this case, the teacher did not take time to understand Lerato’s background or the
challenges she faces at home. Instead of asking questions or offering support, the
teacher assumed that her incomplete work was a result of poor attitude. This
response shows a lack of empathy and fairness. Inclusive education requires
teachers to recognise that learners come from different social and economic
backgrounds. When a teacher ignores these realities, it may cause the learner to
withdraw, lose motivation, and perform even worse academically. Research shows
that learners’ sense of belonging and emotional safety directly influences their
academic performance (Department of Basic Education, 2015). By publicly criticising
Lerato, the teacher weakened that sense of belonging.
Breach of Confidentiality
Another serious ethical issue is the discussion of Lerato’s academic struggles with a
student teacher in a public corridor. Other learners could easily overhear the
conversation. Teachers are trusted with sensitive personal and academic information
about learners. This information must be handled with care and shared only in
appropriate professional spaces.
When confidential information is discussed openly, it places the learner at risk of
further embarrassment and stigma. Confidentiality is not only a professional
expectation but also a foundation of trust between teachers and learners. If learners
believe that their struggles will be shared casually with others, they may hesitate to
seek help in the future. Professional ethical guidelines emphasise that educators
Assignment 2 2026
Unique number:
Due date: 2026
QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One clear ethical concern in this situation is the teacher’s public statement that learners
who do not submit their work show a lack of discipline and commitment. Even though
Lerato’s name was not mentioned, it was obvious to the class who the comment was
about. This led to embarrassment and teasing from other learners. A teacher carries the
responsibility of creating a classroom space where every learner feels respected and
valued. When a learner is indirectly singled out in front of peers, it can damage their
confidence and emotional wellbeing.
In this case, the teacher did not take time to understand Lerato’s background or the
challenges she faces at home. Instead of asking questions or offering support, the teacher
assumed that her incomplete work was a result of poor attitude. This response shows a
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen
as a replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged
to perform their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific
assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the
information in these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content.
The buyer is responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when
applying it to their assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's
policies regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and
sources of inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may
be considered academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences
arising from the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or
any other negative consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One clear ethical concern in this situation is the teacher’s public statement that
learners who do not submit their work show a lack of discipline and commitment.
Even though Lerato’s name was not mentioned, it was obvious to the class who the
comment was about. This led to embarrassment and teasing from other learners. A
teacher carries the responsibility of creating a classroom space where every learner
feels respected and valued. When a learner is indirectly singled out in front of peers,
it can damage their confidence and emotional wellbeing.
In this case, the teacher did not take time to understand Lerato’s background or the
challenges she faces at home. Instead of asking questions or offering support, the
teacher assumed that her incomplete work was a result of poor attitude. This
response shows a lack of empathy and fairness. Inclusive education requires
teachers to recognise that learners come from different social and economic
backgrounds. When a teacher ignores these realities, it may cause the learner to
withdraw, lose motivation, and perform even worse academically. Research shows
that learners’ sense of belonging and emotional safety directly influences their
academic performance (Department of Basic Education, 2015). By publicly criticising
Lerato, the teacher weakened that sense of belonging.
Breach of Confidentiality
Another serious ethical issue is the discussion of Lerato’s academic struggles with a
student teacher in a public corridor. Other learners could easily overhear the
conversation. Teachers are trusted with sensitive personal and academic information
about learners. This information must be handled with care and shared only in
appropriate professional spaces.
When confidential information is discussed openly, it places the learner at risk of
further embarrassment and stigma. Confidentiality is not only a professional
expectation but also a foundation of trust between teachers and learners. If learners
believe that their struggles will be shared casually with others, they may hesitate to
seek help in the future. Professional ethical guidelines emphasise that educators
