TPS3704
Assignment 2 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: 2026
QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One ethical breach evident in the extract is the public remark that learners who fail to submit
their work “lack discipline and commitment.” Although Lerato was not named, the context
made it clear to the class that the comment was directed at her. This resulted in
embarrassment and peer ridicule. Teachers have a professional duty to create a safe and
supportive learning environment that promotes dignity and respect. Public comments that
indirectly single out a learner undermine their self-esteem and emotional wellbeing. In this
case, the teacher failed to consider Lerato’s socio-economic challenges and instead
attributed her academic struggles to personal shortcomings. This is ethically problematic
because it violates principles of fairness, empathy, and inclusive education. It may also
contribute to anxiety, disengagement, and further academic decline.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One ethical breach evident in the extract is the public remark that learners who fail to
submit their work “lack discipline and commitment.” Although Lerato was not named,
the context made it clear to the class that the comment was directed at her. This
resulted in embarrassment and peer ridicule. Teachers have a professional duty to
create a safe and supportive learning environment that promotes dignity and respect.
Public comments that indirectly single out a learner undermine their self-esteem and
emotional wellbeing. In this case, the teacher failed to consider Lerato’s socio-
economic challenges and instead attributed her academic struggles to personal
shortcomings. This is ethically problematic because it violates principles of fairness,
empathy, and inclusive education. It may also contribute to anxiety, disengagement,
and further academic decline.
Breach of Confidentiality
A second ethical breach involves discussing Lerato’s academic difficulties with
another student teacher in a public corridor where learners could overhear. Learners’
personal and academic information must be treated as confidential. Educators are
entrusted with sensitive information and are expected to handle it discreetly.
Discussing a learner’s challenges in an open space compromises confidentiality and
may expose the learner to further humiliation or stigma. Confidentiality is central to
professional trust in education. When breached, it damages the learner-teacher
relationship and undermines the learner’s sense of safety within the school
environment.
Unprofessional Use of Social Media
The third ethical breach relates to posting a frustrated comment about learners on
social media, accompanied by a classroom photograph. Even though no names
were mentioned, the post reflects negatively on learners and the school community.
Teachers are expected to uphold professional conduct both inside and outside the
classroom. Publicly criticising learners on social media demonstrates poor
professional judgement and may harm the reputation of the school and the teaching
Assignment 2 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: 2026
QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One ethical breach evident in the extract is the public remark that learners who fail to submit
their work “lack discipline and commitment.” Although Lerato was not named, the context
made it clear to the class that the comment was directed at her. This resulted in
embarrassment and peer ridicule. Teachers have a professional duty to create a safe and
supportive learning environment that promotes dignity and respect. Public comments that
indirectly single out a learner undermine their self-esteem and emotional wellbeing. In this
case, the teacher failed to consider Lerato’s socio-economic challenges and instead
attributed her academic struggles to personal shortcomings. This is ethically problematic
because it violates principles of fairness, empathy, and inclusive education. It may also
contribute to anxiety, disengagement, and further academic decline.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
Public Humiliation and Lack of Sensitivity
One ethical breach evident in the extract is the public remark that learners who fail to
submit their work “lack discipline and commitment.” Although Lerato was not named,
the context made it clear to the class that the comment was directed at her. This
resulted in embarrassment and peer ridicule. Teachers have a professional duty to
create a safe and supportive learning environment that promotes dignity and respect.
Public comments that indirectly single out a learner undermine their self-esteem and
emotional wellbeing. In this case, the teacher failed to consider Lerato’s socio-
economic challenges and instead attributed her academic struggles to personal
shortcomings. This is ethically problematic because it violates principles of fairness,
empathy, and inclusive education. It may also contribute to anxiety, disengagement,
and further academic decline.
Breach of Confidentiality
A second ethical breach involves discussing Lerato’s academic difficulties with
another student teacher in a public corridor where learners could overhear. Learners’
personal and academic information must be treated as confidential. Educators are
entrusted with sensitive information and are expected to handle it discreetly.
Discussing a learner’s challenges in an open space compromises confidentiality and
may expose the learner to further humiliation or stigma. Confidentiality is central to
professional trust in education. When breached, it damages the learner-teacher
relationship and undermines the learner’s sense of safety within the school
environment.
Unprofessional Use of Social Media
The third ethical breach relates to posting a frustrated comment about learners on
social media, accompanied by a classroom photograph. Even though no names
were mentioned, the post reflects negatively on learners and the school community.
Teachers are expected to uphold professional conduct both inside and outside the
classroom. Publicly criticising learners on social media demonstrates poor
professional judgement and may harm the reputation of the school and the teaching
