Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Leer en línea o como PDF ¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Contract Law Key Cases & Principles Exam | Promises, Performance, Modifications & Exceptions|Latest Update Complete Exam Questions with Verified A+ Graded Answers

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
16
Grado
A+
Subido en
22-01-2026
Escrito en
2025/2026

Contract Law Key Cases & Principles Exam | Promises, Performance, Modifications & Exceptions|Latest Update Complete Exam Questions with Verified A+ Graded Answers Alaska Packers' Association v. Domenico Fishermen, already under contract, refused to work in Alaska unless their wages were increased; employer agreed but later refused to pay the increase. Takeaway from Alaska Packers' Association v. Domenico Opportunistic renegotiation and economic duress—a promise to pay more for the same pre-existing duty is voidable when obtained by improper threat and lack of reasonable alternative. Omni Group v. Seattle-First National Bank Land sale contract made buyer's duty conditional on engineer's 'satisfaction'; seller argued buyer's promise was illusory. Takeaway from Omni Group v. Seattle-First National Bank In a condition of satisfaction with no workable objective standard, the law applies a subjective satisfaction test constrained by an implied duty of good faith rather than treating the promise as illusory. Angel v. Murray Garbage contractor asked city for more money after an unexpected, substantial increase in the number of houses; city granted an increase. Takeaway from Angel v. Murray A one-sided, good-faith modification in response to unanticipated circumstances can be enforceable without new consideration under Restatement § 89, unlike Alaska Packers where duress was present. Joseph Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher Lease renewal clause said future rent was 'to be agreed upon'; tenant asked court to enforce renewal. Takeaway from Joseph Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher A bare 'agreement to agree' on an essential term (rent) without a standard or mechanism is too indefinite and unenforceable. MGM v. Roy Schneider Actor and studio negotiated for a sequel; key terms remained open; dispute whether a binding contract existed. Takeaway from MGM v. Roy Schneider As a relational contract example, the court shows willingness to fill gaps where intent to be bound is clear, but illustrates the limits of enforcement when key terms are left open. Dickinson v. Dodds Seller signed writing to keep an offer to sell land open until Friday but sold to someone else; offeree heard of the sale and then tried to accept. Takeaway from Dickinson v. Dodds Under old common law, an offer purporting to be 'irrevocable' is still revocable absent consideration; reliable notice of sale amounts to effective revocation, so there was no meeting of the minds. James Baird v. Gimbel Brothers Subcontractor mistakenly submitted a very low bid; general contractor relied on it; subcontractor revoked before acceptance. Takeaway from James Baird v. Gimbel Brothers When a contract could have been formed but was not, the subcontractor's offer is freely revocable; promissory estoppel does not make the offer irrevocable without mutual assent. Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly Buyers purchased property later condemned because of a sewage problem unknown to either party; deed contained 'as is' clause. Takeaway from Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly In mutual mistake, courts focus on risk allocation; here an 'as-is' clause allocated the risk of mistake to the buyers, so rescission was denied.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Law Of Contracts
Grado
Law of contracts

Vista previa del contenido

Contract Law Key Cases & Principles Exam |
Promises, Performance, Modifications &
Exceptions|Latest Update Complete Exam
Questions with Verified A+ Graded Answers
Alaska Packers' Association v. Domenico

Fishermen, already under contract, refused to work in Alaska unless their wages were
increased; employer agreed but later refused to pay the increase.

Takeaway from Alaska Packers' Association v. Domenico

Opportunistic renegotiation and economic duress—a promise to pay more for the same pre-
existing duty is voidable when obtained by improper threat and lack of reasonable alternative.

Omni Group v. Seattle-First National Bank

Land sale contract made buyer's duty conditional on engineer's 'satisfaction'; seller argued
buyer's promise was illusory.

Takeaway from Omni Group v. Seattle-First National Bank

In a condition of satisfaction with no workable objective standard, the law applies a subjective
satisfaction test constrained by an implied duty of good faith rather than treating the promise as
illusory.

Angel v. Murray

Garbage contractor asked city for more money after an unexpected, substantial increase in the
number of houses; city granted an increase.

Takeaway from Angel v. Murray

A one-sided, good-faith modification in response to unanticipated circumstances can be
enforceable without new consideration under Restatement § 89, unlike Alaska Packers where
duress was present.

Joseph Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher

Lease renewal clause said future rent was 'to be agreed upon'; tenant asked court to enforce
renewal.

Takeaway from Joseph Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher

1|Page

,A bare 'agreement to agree' on an essential term (rent) without a standard or mechanism is too
indefinite and unenforceable.

MGM v. Roy Schneider

Actor and studio negotiated for a sequel; key terms remained open; dispute whether a binding
contract existed.

Takeaway from MGM v. Roy Schneider

As a relational contract example, the court shows willingness to fill gaps where intent to be
bound is clear, but illustrates the limits of enforcement when key terms are left open.

Dickinson v. Dodds

Seller signed writing to keep an offer to sell land open until Friday but sold to someone else;
offeree heard of the sale and then tried to accept.

Takeaway from Dickinson v. Dodds

Under old common law, an offer purporting to be 'irrevocable' is still revocable absent
consideration; reliable notice of sale amounts to effective revocation, so there was no meeting
of the minds.

James Baird v. Gimbel Brothers

Subcontractor mistakenly submitted a very low bid; general contractor relied on it;
subcontractor revoked before acceptance.

Takeaway from James Baird v. Gimbel Brothers

When a contract could have been formed but was not, the subcontractor's offer is freely
revocable; promissory estoppel does not make the offer irrevocable without mutual assent.

Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly

Buyers purchased property later condemned because of a sewage problem unknown to either
party; deed contained 'as is' clause.

Takeaway from Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly

In mutual mistake, courts focus on risk allocation; here an 'as-is' clause allocated the risk of
mistake to the buyers, so rescission was denied.

Specht v. Netscape

Users downloaded software; the arbitration clause was buried below the 'Download' button
where users would not see it.
2|Page

, Takeaway from Specht v. Netscape

There is a duty to read only when terms are reasonably accessible; clickwrap (clear notice) is
generally enforceable, but browse-wrap hidden terms are not part of the contract.

Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon

Fashion personality gave exclusive marketing rights to an agent; contract didn't explicitly say
agent had to promote the brand.

Takeaway from Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon

Courts imply a duty of best efforts, creating mutuality; an implicit obligation to use best efforts
is sufficient consideration and cures apparent illusoriness.

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

Company advertised a reward for anyone who used its product as directed and still got
influenza; Carlill did and claimed the reward.

Takeaway from Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

A serious advertisement can be a sincere unilateral offer; acceptance is by performance, and no
separate notice of acceptance is required where performance itself is the notice.

Corinthian Pharmaceutical v. Lederle Labs

Buyer tried to lock in a low vaccine price just before a price increase; seller shipped a few vials
saying they were an 'accommodation' and refused the rest.

Takeaway from Corinthian Pharmaceutical v. Lederle Labs

Under UCC 2-206(1)(b), shipment of nonconforming goods with seasonable notice that they are
'only an accommodation' is not an acceptance, but a counteroffer.

Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

Contractor installed pipe of a brand different from that specified but of identical quality; owner
refused final payment.

Takeaway from Jacob & Youngs v. Kent

For service contracts, substantial performance is enough; measure of damages is diminution in
value rather than cost of completion when full replacement would cause economic waste.

Sherwood v. Walker



3|Page

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Law of contracts
Grado
Law of contracts

Información del documento

Subido en
22 de enero de 2026
Número de páginas
16
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

$18.89
Accede al documento completo:

¿Documento equivocado? Cámbialo gratis Dentro de los 14 días posteriores a la compra y antes de descargarlo, puedes elegir otro documento. Puedes gastar el importe de nuevo.
Escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Leer en línea o como PDF

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
StudyHubSolutions Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
438
Miembro desde
4 año
Número de seguidores
309
Documentos
8656
Última venta
2 semanas hace
UPGRADENURSE

Welcome to UPGRADENURSE store! We specialize in reliable test banks, exam questions with verified answers, practice exams, study guides, and complete exam review materials to help students pass on the first try. Our uploads support Nursing programs, professional certifications, business courses, accounting classes, and college-level exams. All documents are well-organized, accurate, exam-focused, and easy to follow, making them ideal for quizzes, midterms, finals, ATI & HESI prep, NCLEX-style practice, certification exams, and last-minute reviews. If you’re looking for trusted test banks, comprehensive exam prep, and time-saving study resources, you’re in the right place.

Lee mas Leer menos
4.2

89 reseñas

5
58
4
12
3
10
2
1
1
8

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes