NRNP 6665-01 PMHNP Final Exam | Week 11 Solutions
2026/2027 Complete Final Examination | Actual Questions &
Verified Solutions | Comprehensive Lifespan Psychiatry |
Advanced Clinical Scenarios | Pass Guarantee
Section 1: Evaluating Arguments (15 Questions)
Question 1
A social media influencer posts: "The new algorithmic feed on Platform X is clearly
designed to manipulate users. After they implemented it last month, my engagement
dropped by 40%, and three other creators I know experienced similar declines. Platform
X is intentionally suppressing independent voices."
What is the main conclusion of this argument?
A) Platform X's algorithmic feed manipulates users
B) The influencer's engagement dropped by 40% last month
C) Three other creators experienced engagement declines
D) Independent voices are being suppressed on social media platforms
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The passage contains multiple statements, but the main conclusion is the
broadest claim that the other statements are intended to support. The conclusion
appears in the first and last sentences: Platform X's feed is designed to manipulate
users (or equivalently, "Platform X is intentionally suppressing independent voices").
,The 40% drop and the experiences of three other creators are premises offered as
evidence for this conclusion. Option B and C are specific premises, not the overarching
conclusion. Option D is too general—the argument is specifically about Platform X, not
all social media platforms.
Question 2
A city council member argues: "We must increase police funding to combat rising crime.
Last year, we had 15% more burglaries than the year before. If we don't add 50 new
officers, our streets will become even more dangerous. Every city that has increased
police funding has seen crime decrease."
Which of the following best identifies an unstated assumption in this argument?
A) Burglary rates are the most important indicator of overall crime
B) Adding 50 new officers will reduce the burglary rate
C) The city council has authority over police funding decisions
D) Crime rates are the only factor in determining police funding needs
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The argument moves from the premise that crime is rising (specifically
burglaries) to the conclusion that adding 50 officers is necessary. The unstated bridge
is the assumption that adding these specific officers will actually reduce crime. While
the argument cites that "every city that has increased police funding has seen crime
decrease," it doesn't explicitly connect this specific increase of 50 officers to the
intended effect. Option A is not assumed—the argument uses burglaries as evidence
but doesn't claim they're the most important indicator. Option C is background
,knowledge, not a logical assumption needed for the argument's validity. Option D is too
extreme and not implied.
Question 3
In a product review blog: "The new EcoTech phone case is overpriced. While it offers
excellent drop protection and is made from sustainable materials, similar cases from
competitors provide comparable protection at half the price. The sleek design doesn't
justify the $80 cost when functionally equivalent options exist for $40."
What function does the claim "The sleek design doesn't justify the $80 cost" serve in the
argument?
A) It is the main conclusion
B) It is a counterexample
C) It is a supporting premise
D) It is an irrelevant observation
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The main conclusion is that "The new EcoTech phone case is overpriced."
This claim about the sleek design serves as a supporting premise that reinforces the
overpricing argument by attacking a potential justification for the high price. It functions
alongside the comparison to competitors' prices to support the conclusion. It's not a
counterexample (B) because it doesn't contradict a general claim with a specific
instance. It's not irrelevant (D) because design justification is directly relevant to price
assessment.
Question 4
, During a workplace meeting, a manager states: "Our remote work policy has failed.
Productivity decreased 8% this quarter, customer satisfaction scores dropped, and three
clients complained about delayed responses. We should require all employees to return
to the office five days a week starting next month."
Which of the following best describes the argument structure?
A) A general principle applied to a specific case
B) A causal claim supported by correlational evidence
C) An inductive generalization from multiple instances
D) A deductive argument with missing premises
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The argument claims remote work caused the negative outcomes
(productivity drop, satisfaction decline, client complaints). However, the evidence shows
correlation—these events occurred during remote work, but the argument doesn't rule
out other potential causes. This is classic correlation-presented-as-causation. It's not
deductive (D) because the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from the premises. It's
not a simple generalization (C) because it's making a specific causal claim, not
extending a pattern. It's not applying a general principle (A) because no established
principle is stated.
Question 5
A health blogger writes: "People should avoid artificial sweeteners. A 2023 study found
that rats consuming high amounts of aspartame developed increased cancer rates. My
neighbor switched to diet soda with aspartame last year and was recently diagnosed
with lymphoma. Chemical additives are clearly dangerous to human health."
2026/2027 Complete Final Examination | Actual Questions &
Verified Solutions | Comprehensive Lifespan Psychiatry |
Advanced Clinical Scenarios | Pass Guarantee
Section 1: Evaluating Arguments (15 Questions)
Question 1
A social media influencer posts: "The new algorithmic feed on Platform X is clearly
designed to manipulate users. After they implemented it last month, my engagement
dropped by 40%, and three other creators I know experienced similar declines. Platform
X is intentionally suppressing independent voices."
What is the main conclusion of this argument?
A) Platform X's algorithmic feed manipulates users
B) The influencer's engagement dropped by 40% last month
C) Three other creators experienced engagement declines
D) Independent voices are being suppressed on social media platforms
Correct Answer: A
Rationale: The passage contains multiple statements, but the main conclusion is the
broadest claim that the other statements are intended to support. The conclusion
appears in the first and last sentences: Platform X's feed is designed to manipulate
users (or equivalently, "Platform X is intentionally suppressing independent voices").
,The 40% drop and the experiences of three other creators are premises offered as
evidence for this conclusion. Option B and C are specific premises, not the overarching
conclusion. Option D is too general—the argument is specifically about Platform X, not
all social media platforms.
Question 2
A city council member argues: "We must increase police funding to combat rising crime.
Last year, we had 15% more burglaries than the year before. If we don't add 50 new
officers, our streets will become even more dangerous. Every city that has increased
police funding has seen crime decrease."
Which of the following best identifies an unstated assumption in this argument?
A) Burglary rates are the most important indicator of overall crime
B) Adding 50 new officers will reduce the burglary rate
C) The city council has authority over police funding decisions
D) Crime rates are the only factor in determining police funding needs
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The argument moves from the premise that crime is rising (specifically
burglaries) to the conclusion that adding 50 officers is necessary. The unstated bridge
is the assumption that adding these specific officers will actually reduce crime. While
the argument cites that "every city that has increased police funding has seen crime
decrease," it doesn't explicitly connect this specific increase of 50 officers to the
intended effect. Option A is not assumed—the argument uses burglaries as evidence
but doesn't claim they're the most important indicator. Option C is background
,knowledge, not a logical assumption needed for the argument's validity. Option D is too
extreme and not implied.
Question 3
In a product review blog: "The new EcoTech phone case is overpriced. While it offers
excellent drop protection and is made from sustainable materials, similar cases from
competitors provide comparable protection at half the price. The sleek design doesn't
justify the $80 cost when functionally equivalent options exist for $40."
What function does the claim "The sleek design doesn't justify the $80 cost" serve in the
argument?
A) It is the main conclusion
B) It is a counterexample
C) It is a supporting premise
D) It is an irrelevant observation
Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The main conclusion is that "The new EcoTech phone case is overpriced."
This claim about the sleek design serves as a supporting premise that reinforces the
overpricing argument by attacking a potential justification for the high price. It functions
alongside the comparison to competitors' prices to support the conclusion. It's not a
counterexample (B) because it doesn't contradict a general claim with a specific
instance. It's not irrelevant (D) because design justification is directly relevant to price
assessment.
Question 4
, During a workplace meeting, a manager states: "Our remote work policy has failed.
Productivity decreased 8% this quarter, customer satisfaction scores dropped, and three
clients complained about delayed responses. We should require all employees to return
to the office five days a week starting next month."
Which of the following best describes the argument structure?
A) A general principle applied to a specific case
B) A causal claim supported by correlational evidence
C) An inductive generalization from multiple instances
D) A deductive argument with missing premises
Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The argument claims remote work caused the negative outcomes
(productivity drop, satisfaction decline, client complaints). However, the evidence shows
correlation—these events occurred during remote work, but the argument doesn't rule
out other potential causes. This is classic correlation-presented-as-causation. It's not
deductive (D) because the conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from the premises. It's
not a simple generalization (C) because it's making a specific causal claim, not
extending a pattern. It's not applying a general principle (A) because no established
principle is stated.
Question 5
A health blogger writes: "People should avoid artificial sweeteners. A 2023 study found
that rats consuming high amounts of aspartame developed increased cancer rates. My
neighbor switched to diet soda with aspartame last year and was recently diagnosed
with lymphoma. Chemical additives are clearly dangerous to human health."
