ILRLR 3300 FINAL EXAM 2025/2026
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 100% PASS.
Argument from Direction - ANS An argument that strings together two or more conditional
statements to predict a remote result from a first step
Argument from example - ANS An argument that draws a conclusion about an entire class of
objects or events based on particular instance or a limited number of cases, rather than about a
single member of a group
Argument from function - ANS An argument that locates the essential nature of an object,
event, or institution in its social or natural function
Argument from intent - ANS An argument that affirms that the meaning or essential nature
of an object or document is revealed in the intended meaning if its authors or designers
Argument from principle - ANS An argument that affirms that we should abide by values,
principles, and duties, and avoid actions that violate the same
Argument from quality - ANS An argument that expresses a preference for the unique, the
beautiful, the rare, or the unusual.
Argument from quanitity - ANS An argument that affirms numerical considerations as an
index of signifigance
1 @COPYRIGHT 2025/2026 ALLRIGHTS RESERVED.
, Argument from sign - ANS An argument that reasons from an effect back to a cause
Argument virtues - ANS Those moral qualities and skills that help people think and act
morally in an argumentative situation, and thus pursue argumentation in a manner that
promotes and improves its practices
Arrangement fallacy - ANS The fallacy that creates a false impression by ordering, associating,
or grouping items of evidence in a misleading way
Attitudinal inherency - ANS In policy debate, the inherency that shows that current attitudes
or beliefs contribute to the problems caused by the status quo
Audience analysis - ANS Seeking an accurate sense of the nature of the audience so you can
adapt your arguments to that audience
Biased testimony - ANS Testimony from individuals who stand to gain if what they say is
accepted
Burden of proof - ANS In policy debate, the obligation to provide sufficient evidence in
support of an assertion
Categorical statement - ANS A statement that asserts a relationship between two categories,
or classes, of objects
Categorical argument - ANS An argument composed of three categorical statements-- two
statements that are its reasons, or premises, and one that is its conclusion. Also called a
categorical syllogism
Casual agent - ANS In a hypothesis, a testable element in the alleged cause that is capable of
producing an observed effect
2 @COPYRIGHT 2025/2026 ALLRIGHTS RESERVED.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 100% PASS.
Argument from Direction - ANS An argument that strings together two or more conditional
statements to predict a remote result from a first step
Argument from example - ANS An argument that draws a conclusion about an entire class of
objects or events based on particular instance or a limited number of cases, rather than about a
single member of a group
Argument from function - ANS An argument that locates the essential nature of an object,
event, or institution in its social or natural function
Argument from intent - ANS An argument that affirms that the meaning or essential nature
of an object or document is revealed in the intended meaning if its authors or designers
Argument from principle - ANS An argument that affirms that we should abide by values,
principles, and duties, and avoid actions that violate the same
Argument from quality - ANS An argument that expresses a preference for the unique, the
beautiful, the rare, or the unusual.
Argument from quanitity - ANS An argument that affirms numerical considerations as an
index of signifigance
1 @COPYRIGHT 2025/2026 ALLRIGHTS RESERVED.
, Argument from sign - ANS An argument that reasons from an effect back to a cause
Argument virtues - ANS Those moral qualities and skills that help people think and act
morally in an argumentative situation, and thus pursue argumentation in a manner that
promotes and improves its practices
Arrangement fallacy - ANS The fallacy that creates a false impression by ordering, associating,
or grouping items of evidence in a misleading way
Attitudinal inherency - ANS In policy debate, the inherency that shows that current attitudes
or beliefs contribute to the problems caused by the status quo
Audience analysis - ANS Seeking an accurate sense of the nature of the audience so you can
adapt your arguments to that audience
Biased testimony - ANS Testimony from individuals who stand to gain if what they say is
accepted
Burden of proof - ANS In policy debate, the obligation to provide sufficient evidence in
support of an assertion
Categorical statement - ANS A statement that asserts a relationship between two categories,
or classes, of objects
Categorical argument - ANS An argument composed of three categorical statements-- two
statements that are its reasons, or premises, and one that is its conclusion. Also called a
categorical syllogism
Casual agent - ANS In a hypothesis, a testable element in the alleged cause that is capable of
producing an observed effect
2 @COPYRIGHT 2025/2026 ALLRIGHTS RESERVED.
