bus 206

Read the Lucy v. Zehmer case summary in the “Elements of the Offer” section of Chapter 14 in your textbook, and the analyze the case in relation to contract law. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Identify the contractual element Zehmer contended was missing. Summarize the court ruling and explain the reason for the ruling. Agree or disagree with the ruling, and include a rationale to support your ideas. Summarize a personal experience in which you entered...

Slideshow for project 1

The Environmentalist Case for Simple Living Emrys Westacott 1. What is the environmentalist case for frugal simplicity? 2. What rebuttal does Emrys Westacott give to the claim that individual choices make no real difference? Write at least a paragraph (5 to 8 sentences) response for each question.

sophia business law milestone 1 ( exam 1) with answers

BUS 206/2-Final Exam Questions Answers

BUS 206 Unit two Milstone business law 1 Which of the following statements about torts and crimes is true? • Torts carry a legal remedy of damages, while crimes do not. • A criminal act is immoral, while a tortious act is not. • Tort law is more concerned than criminal law about the reasons for a defendant’s actions. • An act may either be a crime or a tort, but not both. CONCEPT Introduction to Tort Law 2 An example of foreseeable damages from a faulty repair of your car that led to a...