100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Notas de lectura

AQA A LEVEL PSYCHOLOGY NOTES - SOCIAL INFLUENCE

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
12
Subido en
22-03-2024
Escrito en
2023/2024

NOTES FOR AS AND A LEVEL SOCIAL INFLUENCE

Institución
Grado

Vista previa del contenido

, Social influence
Types of conformity (Hebert Kelman)
Internalisation
Occurs when a person genuinely accepts the groups norms.
Identification
Sometimes conform the opinions/ behaviours of a group because there is
something about that group that we value.
Compliance
Involves simply going along with others’ in public, but privately disagreeing.

Explanation for conformity (Morton Deutsh and Harold Gerard)
Informational social influence
The idea that we agree with the opinion of the majority because we believe it is
correct, this may lead to internalisation.
Normative social influence
The idea that says we agree with the opinion of the majority because we want to
be accepted, this may lead to compliance.
Support for Informative social influence
Lucas et al asked students mathematical problems and found that those who
judged their mathematical abilities as poor agreed with the majority even if the
answer was more difficult and wrong.
Individual differences with Normative social influence
Naffiliators are those who have a desire/need to be liked. McGhee as Teevan found
that students high in need of affiliation were more likely to conform.
Informative and normative social influence
Both processes are involved, in Aschs experiment, the dissenter may reduce the
power of NSI or may reduce the power of ISI.

Solomon Asch
Procedure:
123 American male undergraduates were shown two large white cards, on one
card there was a standard line, on the other there were 3 lines, one matching the
line on the other card and the other 2 were clearly a different length. Each
participant was in a group of 6-8 confederates but they didn’t know. The
participants took part in 18 trials and 12 of them, the confederates purposely
answered wrong.
Findings:
The participants gave the wrong answer 36.8% of the time. 75% did conform at
least once. The term ‘Asch effect’ has been used to describe this result, the extent
to which participants conform even when the situation is ambiguous, the
participants were interviewed and they said they confirmed to avoid rejection
(normative social influence).

Escuela, estudio y materia

Nivel de Estudio
Editores
Tema
Curso

Información del documento

Subido en
22 de marzo de 2024
Número de páginas
12
Escrito en
2023/2024
Tipo
NOTAS DE LECTURA
Profesor(es)
Ms begum
Contiene
Todas las clases

Temas

11,51 €
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
suzannakomisarek

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
suzannakomisarek stoke newington school and sixth form
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
-
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
12
Última venta
-

0,0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes