Mrl3701 insolvency law Study guides, Study notes & Summaries

Looking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about Mrl3701 insolvency law? On this page you'll find 79 study documents about Mrl3701 insolvency law.

Page 3 out of 79 results

Sort by

Full summary of MRL3701 for the whole semester
  • Full summary of MRL3701 for the whole semester

  • Summary • 63 pages • 2023
  • A detailed summary of all the course work covered in semester one.
    (0)
  • R80,00
  • + learn more
MRL3701 | Prescribed Book Summary
  • MRL3701 | Prescribed Book Summary

  • Summary • 137 pages • 2021
  • This document consists of notes based on the study guide and prescribed book. Great for revision and assignment help.
    (0)
  • R50,00
  • 1x sold
  • + learn more
Summary of Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2022
  • Summary of Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2022

  • Summary • 2 pages • 2022
  • Summary of Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) with referral to legislation, case law, and footnotes inserted.
    (0)
  • R150,00
  • 1x sold
  • + learn more
MRL3701 - Insolvency Law summary
  • MRL3701 - Insolvency Law summary

  • Summary • 86 pages • 2021
  • Available in package deal
  • MRL3701 - Insolvency Law summary S`tudy unit 1INTRODUCTION TO INSOLVENCY LAW Identify the problem faced by the court in Magnum Financial Holdings. The only problem before the court was whether a trust could, at law, be sequestrated. Summarise the authority which the court relied on to solve the problem which it faced. No South African case seemed to have dealt with whether a trust could be sequestrated in terms of section 9(1) read with the definition of “debtor” in section 2 of 16 th...
    (0)
  • R66,21
  • + learn more
MRL3701 STUDY NOTES.
  • MRL3701 STUDY NOTES.

  • Summary • 144 pages • 2021
  • MRL3701 STUDY NOTES. MRL3701 - Insolvency Law. INTRODUCTION TO INSOLVENCY LAW Identify the problem faced by the court in Magnum Financial Holdings. The only problem before the court was whether a trust could, at law, be sequestrated. Summarise the authority which the court relied on to solve the problem which it faced. No South African case seemed to have dealt with whether a trust could be sequestrated in terms of section 9(1) read with the definition of “debtor” in section 2 of 16 t...
    (0)
  • R66,21
  • + learn more