Mrl3701 insolvency law Study guides, Study notes & Summaries

MRL3701 Assignment 2 | 13th APRIL 2024. Solutions YOU CAN TRUST! Footnotes and Bibliography INCLUDED! In terms of section 8 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936,1 any creditor who is owed more than R100 can apply to court for the compulsory sequestration of the debtor's estate. Wandile is in debt of R3 million spread across multiple creditors, including a debt of R400,000 to Zozo and R1.3 million to DRG Bank. His financial woes began last year after a significant loss from an investment in a ...

MRL3701 INSOLVENCY LAW JAN/FEB 2022 EXAM. QUESTION 1 1.1 Epstein v Epstein 1987 (4) SA 606 (C) Legal Question – is “friendly/ cordial sequestration blocked from a temporary sequestration request being granted? Facts – the candidate in an application for temporary sequestration request was the respondent’s mother, whom he owed R6000.00 and to whom he composed a letter advising her of his inability to reimburse her credit, subsequently submitting a demonstration of bankruptcy. The r...

MRL3701 Exam Answers Pack: Questions and Answers LATEST EXAM PACK!

MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 - 2023 UNIQUE NUMBER: CLOSING DATE: 31 AUGUST 2023 QUESTION 1 See the table below and match the three columns to answer the following questions. You must therefore answer the question as follows on your answer sheet (see ONLY AN EXAMPLE below) and do so for every question (a) – (e). (a) 1. Case name: Ex Parte Snooke 2014 (5) SA 426 (FB) (1/2 mark) 2. Ratio decidendi of the case: This was an application for rehabilitation. Several cases of abuses o...

MRL3701 (Insolvency Law) Assignment 1 solutions for Semester 1 (2023). (Guaranteed Pass). All the best with your study year. This assignment will help you a great deal, the instructions given have been followed and the correct articles researched with the prescribed book: The Law of Contract in South Africa. Hutchison, D. (To be used as a Guideline). QUESTION: Critically discuss the case of Amod v Khan 1947 (2) SA 432 (N) with reference to the relevant legislation.

A SUMMARY OF THE FOLLOWING INSOLVENCY LAW CASES: 1. Magnum Financial Holdings; 2. Ex parte Henning; 3. Epstein v Epstein; 4. Amod v Kahn; 5. Vorster v Steyn; 6. Estate Wege v Strauss; 7. Pretorius' Trustee; 8. Hendriks NO v Swanepoel; 9. Pretorius NO v Stock Owners' Co-operative; 10. Prinsloo en ’n ander v Van Zyl; 11. Rand Air (Pty) Ltd v Ray Bester Investments, etc.

Question and Answers from previous exams and assignments for Insolvency Law. Guarantee Pass

MRL3701 INSOLVENCY LAW SEMESTER 1: ASSIGNMENT 2 UNIQUE NUMBER: STUDENT NUMBER: