SJD1501
Assignment 6 Semester 2 2025
2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: 30 October 2025
QUESTION 1
Idea 1: Deny bail for repeat GBV offenders
Motivation: If an accused has past GBV charges or convictions, they should not be granted
bail. This reduces the risk of reoffending while awaiting trial and shows that the justice
system takes survivors' safety seriously.
Idea 2: Compulsory victim input before bail decisions
Motivation: The survivor's voice must be heard in court before bail is granted. This gives
the court insight into the risks and emotional harm the victim may face if the accused is
released.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
1. Causes of Corruption in SASSA
Corruption in the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) stems from
systemic governance failures and technological vulnerabilities. One major cause is
the lack of robust internal controls, especially in the Social Relief of Distress (SRD)
grant system. According to GroundUp (2025), the SRD application system has
several flaws, including weak identity verification and poor encryption protocols.
These gaps enable fraudsters to apply using details of deceased persons or newly
turned 18-year-olds.
Another critical factor is political interference and collusion between corrupt officials
and external syndicates, who exploit the system for personal gain (Corruption Watch,
2025). For example, long-standing irregularities in the Cash Paymaster Services
(CPS) contract reveal the extent of unchecked procurement practices (Parliament,
2025).
Additionally, poor coordination between SASSA and other state departments, such
as Home Affairs and SARS, allows for duplicate or fraudulent applications due to the
lack of real-time data sharing (Abrahams, 2025). Limited use of advanced
technology and undertrained staff further weaken the system, making it susceptible
to manipulation and abuse.
The culture of impunity within SASSA also contributes to the problem. Corrupt
individuals are rarely held accountable, and disciplinary action is inconsistent,
fostering an environment where unethical conduct thrives (Masango, 2025). These
internal weaknesses, coupled with limited public oversight and transparency, provide
fertile ground for corruption.
In short, the causes of SASSA corruption lie in a combination of outdated systems,
weak enforcement mechanisms, and poor integration with broader governance
structures.
2. Consequences of SASSA Corruption
Assignment 6 Semester 2 2025
2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: 30 October 2025
QUESTION 1
Idea 1: Deny bail for repeat GBV offenders
Motivation: If an accused has past GBV charges or convictions, they should not be granted
bail. This reduces the risk of reoffending while awaiting trial and shows that the justice
system takes survivors' safety seriously.
Idea 2: Compulsory victim input before bail decisions
Motivation: The survivor's voice must be heard in court before bail is granted. This gives
the court insight into the risks and emotional harm the victim may face if the accused is
released.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
1. Causes of Corruption in SASSA
Corruption in the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) stems from
systemic governance failures and technological vulnerabilities. One major cause is
the lack of robust internal controls, especially in the Social Relief of Distress (SRD)
grant system. According to GroundUp (2025), the SRD application system has
several flaws, including weak identity verification and poor encryption protocols.
These gaps enable fraudsters to apply using details of deceased persons or newly
turned 18-year-olds.
Another critical factor is political interference and collusion between corrupt officials
and external syndicates, who exploit the system for personal gain (Corruption Watch,
2025). For example, long-standing irregularities in the Cash Paymaster Services
(CPS) contract reveal the extent of unchecked procurement practices (Parliament,
2025).
Additionally, poor coordination between SASSA and other state departments, such
as Home Affairs and SARS, allows for duplicate or fraudulent applications due to the
lack of real-time data sharing (Abrahams, 2025). Limited use of advanced
technology and undertrained staff further weaken the system, making it susceptible
to manipulation and abuse.
The culture of impunity within SASSA also contributes to the problem. Corrupt
individuals are rarely held accountable, and disciplinary action is inconsistent,
fostering an environment where unethical conduct thrives (Masango, 2025). These
internal weaknesses, coupled with limited public oversight and transparency, provide
fertile ground for corruption.
In short, the causes of SASSA corruption lie in a combination of outdated systems,
weak enforcement mechanisms, and poor integration with broader governance
structures.
2. Consequences of SASSA Corruption
