Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Exam (elaborations)

MRL2601 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages

MRL2601 Assignment 1 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references ,... Two partners who are practicing as quantity surveyors, Marcus and Cobus, decide to dissolve their partnership by agreement. The partnership agreement is silent regarding the goodwill of the partnership. Cobus continues practicing as a quantity surveyor and de facto takes the partnership’s clients (valued at R1 million) over for his own benefit. Marcus feels it is unfair that Cobus has taken over all of the clients and wishes to institute legal action to claim his part of the goodwill. Discuss the essential elements of a partnership formation. Explain the difference between the two types of trusts envisaged in the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 Briefly explain what the purpose of the establishment of a trust is and what parties are involved in a trust. Name different reasons for which a partnership can be terminated. Name the different reasons for which a partnership can be terminated. Cobus continues practicing as a quantity surveyor and de facto takes the partnership’s clients (valued at R1 million) over for his own benefit. Marcus feels it is unfair that Cobus has taken over all of the clients and wishes to institute legal action to claim his part of the goodwill. Explain whether there is a remedy to Marcus’ disposal in these circumstances.

Content preview

HRM3705
Assignment 3 Semester 2 2025
Unique #

Due Date: 12 September 2025

Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.

+27 81 278 3372

, QUESTION 1

1.1 Union influence on remuneration system design at Mpofu Cleaning Centre

At Mpofu Cleaning Centre, the role of the General Services Workers Union (GSWU)
is likely to have a strong effect on how the remuneration system is structured. Since
most employees are unionised, the organisation cannot ignore collective concerns
when introducing pay models. Unions emphasise fairness, equity, and transparency,
which means that any system viewed as undermining teamwork or rewarding
individuals unfairly will face resistance. A performance-based system may clash with
union values if it promotes competition over cooperation, especially in a labour-
intensive service industry where teamwork is critical (Coetzee et al, 2020).

The union will also push for collective rewards, such as across-the-board increases,
cost-of-living adjustments, and benefits that support workers’ wellbeing. This
pressure could lead management to blend individual incentives with group-based
rewards, ensuring that productivity goals align with equity and fairness. In addition,
unions may insist on transparent evaluation criteria, grievance procedures, and
consultation rights before remuneration policies are finalised.

In the context of Mpofu Cleaning Centre, where employees perform relatively low-
paid, manual work, unions will be especially sensitive to systems that risk widening
income gaps or discouraging solidarity. The design of the remuneration structure will
therefore need to combine fair base wages, transparent bonus criteria, and non-
monetary benefits such as medical aid or leave provisions. Ultimately, union
involvement forces management to balance efficiency goals with equity and morale,
ensuring that the system gains legitimacy among the workforce while avoiding
industrial conflict (Coetzee et al, 2020).




1.2 Strategic role of unions in shaping remuneration outcomes

The General Services Workers Union (GSWU) plays a strategic role in influencing
pay levels and bargaining outcomes at Mpofu Cleaning Centre. Through collective
bargaining, the union negotiates with management to secure minimum wages,



Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372

Connected book
 image
Piet A. Delport New Entrepreneurial Law
Publisher: 2014 ISBN: 9780409118179 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
September 5, 2025
File latest updated on
July 25, 2026
Number of pages
5
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
VarsityC
4,1
(2898)
Sold
29123
Followers
13262
Items
3392
Last sold
16 hours ago

Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions