100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

RRLLB81 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025 - The enforcement of the right to a healthy Environment

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
9
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
04-09-2025
Written in
2025/2026

RRLLB81 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us.... The enforcement of the right to a healthy Environment An environmental right can be seen to encompass a variety of protections. It can effectively be enforced by a group of people seeking to prevent pollution. Equally, the Constitution states that everyone has a right to a healthy environment. This clearly indicates that the right is individualistic in its nature. Thus, it is clear that everyone has a right to petition a court to prevent, for example, air pollution. One wonders what should be an effective way of enforcing an environment right? Is an individual who is directly and immediately affected by air pollution in a better position to petition the court? Perhaps, a group (NGO) should assume the responsibility of ensuring that air pollution is minimised or prevented. Maybe the state (government) should play an effective role of securing a healthy environment for the benefit of the public at large. What is your opinion about the enforcement of environmental right and who should be best positioned to enforce the right. Cases Minister of Health and Welfare v Woodcarb (Pty) LTD 1996 (3) SA 155 (N) Minister of Environmental Affairs v Trustees for the time being of Groundwork Trust 2025 (4) SA 98 (SCA) Books Currie I and de Waal J, The Bill of Rights: HandBook (6th edn, Juta 2017) Kidd M, Environmental Law (2nd edn, Juta 2017) Legislation National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004 Journal Articles Kruger H, ‘The Silent Right: Environmental Rights in the Constitutional Court of South Africa’ 2019 Constitutional Court Review 473 Kidd M, ‘Deadly Air and the Misinterpretation of the Section 24 Environmental Right: The Groundwork Trust Case’ (2023) 23 PER / PELJ 1 Glazewski J, ‘The environment, Human Rights and a New South African Constitution’ (1991) 7(2) SAJHR 167

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
September 4, 2025
Number of pages
9
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

RRLLB81 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2025 - DUE
September 2025 - The
enforcement of the right to a
healthy Environment


FOR FURTHER
ASSISTANCE PLEASE
EMAIL


M

, RRLLB81 Assignment 2: The Enforcement of
the Right to a Healthy Environment
Introduction

The South African Constitution of 1996 is internationally celebrated for its strong commitment
to human rights, equality, and dignity. Among its many innovative provisions, Section 24
guarantees everyone the right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being
and to have the environment protected for the benefit of present and future generations. This
constitutional environmental right represents a radical departure from the past, when
environmental protection was often subordinated to economic development and industrial
growth.

But recognition of the right is only the beginning. Its true value lies in the enforcement
mechanisms available to give it practical meaning. The question of who is best placed to enforce
environmental rights—individuals, groups such as NGOs, or the state—raises important
theoretical and practical debates. Should enforcement depend on direct individual harm, or is
the environment a collective resource demanding collective action? Can NGOs serve as
watchdogs when the state fails, or should the state bear the primary duty to secure
environmental justice?

This essay critically explores these questions. It analyses the constitutional framework, the
National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), the Air Quality Act, and key judicial
precedents such as Minister of Health and Welfare v Woodcarb (Pty) Ltd 1996 (3) SA 155 (N)
and Minister of Environmental Affairs v Trustees for the time being of Groundwork Trust 2025
(4) SA 98 (SCA). It also engages with academic commentary from Kidd, Currie and de Waal,
Kruger, and Glazewski. The discussion demonstrates that enforcement of the environmental right
requires a multi-actor approach, where individuals, NGOs, and the state all play essential roles,
albeit with different strengths and responsibilities.



Constitutional Foundations of Environmental Rights

Section 24 of the Constitution

Section 24 of the Constitution provides:

"Everyone has the right—
(a) to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being; and

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
kevinlugwiri98 Teachme2-tutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
28
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
100
Last sold
1 month ago

3,5

4 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions