100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
8
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
20-08-2025
Written in
2025/2026

Achieve a distinction with this comprehensive and well-organized set of SUS1501 Assignment 2 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. Ensure accuracy and excellence in your submission!!!! In assignment 1, one of the questions was: "In 2024, Elon Musk's net worth increased by about ZAR 12 billion every day!" My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this. b. The only problem I have with this is that it wasn’t me getting ZAR 12 billion richer every day! c. No problem with this. I'm sure all of these billionaires donate huge amounts to charities. d. I think that it is morally wrong for anyone to earn that much money. e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoral earnings Do you remember which option you chose? In this assignment we are going to zoom in on option “a” specifically: “Good for him – he worked hard to earn this”. What this option is basically saying is, that the earnings of billionaires like Musk are completely reasonable and justifiable? What we want you to do in this assignment is to examine this option (i.e. someone, perhaps even you, earning R 12 billion a day for a year) from the perspective of Kant’s formula of universal law version of the categorical imperative. 2. EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (We've done the first two stages for you) 1. State your proposed act as a maxim: "Elon Musk will take R 12 billion (A) every day for a year (C) in order to get really, really rich (E)." 2. Restate this maxim as a universal law: "All people (8.1 billion of them) will take R 12 billion every day for a year in order to get really, really rich." 3. Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal law;

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 20, 2025
Number of pages
8
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

SUS1501
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
2 2025 621187
Unique Number:
Due date: 22 August 2025
BACKGROUND FACTS

In assignment 1, one of the questions was:

"In 2024, Elon Musk's net worth increased by about ZAR 12 billion every day!" My personal opinion on this
statement is most closely described by:

a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this.
b. The only problem I have with this is that it wasn’t me getting ZAR 12 billion richer every day!
c. No problem with this. I'm sure all of these billionaires donate huge amounts to charities.
d. I think that it is morally wrong for anyone to earn that much money.
e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoral earnings
Do you remember which option you chose?

In this assignment we are going to zoom in on option “a” specifically: “Good for him – he worked
hard to earn this”. What this option is basically saying is, that the earnings of billionaires like
Musk are completely reasonable and justifiable?

What we want you to do in this assignment is to examine this option (i.e. someone, perhaps
even you, earning R 12 billion a day for a year) from the perspective of Kant’s formula of
universal law version of the categorical imperative.



DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
 Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
 Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
 Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
 Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.

, For additional support +27 81 278 3372

SUS1501 – Sustainability and Greed

Student Number:
Date:
Teaching Assistant Name:

Declaration:

By submitting this assignment, I implicitly declare that this is my own work.

I am aware that if ANY unacknowledged copying is detected in ANY part of this
assignment, I will get 0 (zero) for the entire assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:
 Fill in your assignment contributions in the boxes where you see “<Answer in
here>”. DO NOT DELETE THE TEMPLATE CONTENT TO REDUCE YOUR TURNITIN
SCORE;
 Save the file as a Word document with a short name (myUnisa will reject files with
long names);
 Submit this file into the Assessment 2 assignment space on myUnisa;
 Take a screen grab of the final submission acknowledgement on myUnisa and save
this somewhere safe in case of any disputes:
 Check under the Assignments tool that there is a date in the “Processed” cell for the
SUS1501 Assignment 5.
 NB – DO NOT RESUMBIT AN ASSIGNMENT AFTER THE DEADLINE HAS PASSED EVEN
IF THE SYSTEM ALLOWS YOU TO DO SO. THIS WILL CHANGE YOUR SUBMISSION
DATE AND YOUR SUBMISSION WILL REFLECT AS LATE

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Edge
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
9673
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
4252
Documents
2643
Last sold
1 day ago

4,2

1173 reviews

5
660
4
236
3
177
2
27
1
73

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions