Assignment 2 QUIZ Semester 2 2025
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
Unique number:
Due Date: 2025
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
, LEV3701-25-S2 Welcome Message Assessment 2
QUIZ
Started on Monday, 4 August 2025, 9:35 PM
State Finished
Completed on Monday, 4 August 2025, 10:09 PM
Time taken 34 mins 3 secs
Marks 18.00/20.00
Grade 90.00 out of 100.00
Question 1
Complete
Mark 1.00 out of 1.00
Consider the following statements and identify the correct statement:
A.
(c) According to Magmoed v Janse van Rensburg 1993 (1) SACR 67 (A), a witness must be informed about his or
her privilege against self-incrimination unless, based on the facts of the case, he or she could be expected to be
aware of this privilege.
B.
(a) Privileged evidence is excluded because it is irrelevant.
C.
(c) A witness in a criminal case may refuse to answer a question by reason that the answer may bring about civil
liability on his part.
D.
(a) For obvious reasons, private privilege only exists during the trial and not also during all pre-trial procedures.
Question 2
Complete
Mark 1.00 out of 1.00
The plaintiff testifies that just before a road accident he had seen a lorry coming towards him. During cross-examination it is
suggested to him has fabricated this sighting of the lorry because he did not mention the lorry when making his statement to
the police. The plaintiff no wants to submit evidence that he mentioned the lorry to another witness shortly after the accident.
This evidence will be ...
A. inadmissible due to irrelevance.
B. admissible to corroborate the plaintiff's evidence.
C. hearsay evidence.
D. admissible to support the plaintiff's credibility.