• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages
Exam (elaborations)

ENG1504 October November Portfolio (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE 12 October 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages

ENG1504 October November Portfolio (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE 12 October 2026; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... As the Administrative Officer for Community Engagement Services at MCC, write an investigative report on the efficient introduction of fees for the MindExpand Community College high school intervention classes. You are expected to submit the report to the Director of Operations at MindExpand Community College, Professor Kitika, by 30 October 2026. Your report should not exceed 3 pages in length. Copy and rewrite the title, terms of reference, and procedures as provided, then write your own findings, conclusions, and recommendations to align with the other sections. Finally, copy and rewrite the compiler’s details, as provided. TITLE A REPORT ON AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFICIENT INTRODUCTION OF FEES FOR THE HIGH SCHOOL INTERVENTION CLASSES PROVIDED BY MINDEXPAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN MIDVALLEY TOWNSHIP 1. TERMS OF REFERENCE At a directorate meeting on 30 September 2026, Professor PT Kitika, the Director of Operations at MindExpand Community College (MCC), requested Ms T Phashane, the Administrative Officer for Community Engagement Services at MCC, to conduct an investigation into an efficient introduction of fees for the MindExpand Community College high school intervention classes. The investigation was to consider matters of fairness, practicality, and mutual benefit. The final report, including recommendations, was to be submitted to Professor Kitika by 30 October 2026. 2. PROCEDURES The following procedures were followed to gather relevant information: 2.1 Survey questionnaires were distributed to parents in the community to determine if they would be willing to pay for the extra classes. 2.2 A meeting was held with high school learners at the community hall to discuss the value and benefits of the extra classes. 5 2.3. Ms Z Zaluma, the local actuary, was consulted to calculate the estimated fees to be paid against the value of the classes and future prospects of the MCC high school intervention. 2.4 Transport logs were analysed to calculate the costs related to lecturers’ driving to various high schools for the Saturday classes. 3. FINDINGS Present the factual information found during the investigation under each method/step/procedure used above to collect information. are expected as per your procedures identified above. CONCLUSIONS Comment, analyse, and interpret the factual information (findings) above. Provide conclusions. 5. RECOMMENDATIONS Provide possible recommendations that are aligned to the purpose of the investigation. Do not instruct but make three (3) suggestions that you think can be followed to resolve the issue.

Content preview

ENG1504
May June PORTFOLIO Semester 1 2026
Unique number:
Due Date: 20 May 2026
QUESTION 1: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT (3 Different Answers Provided)

REPORT ON AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE OPEN
LEARNING BURSARY SCHEME AT MARARA TECHNICAL COLLEGE IN TOEMASKOP

1. TERMS OF REFERENCE

On 1 May 2026, Ms Thando Morule, Student Support Manager at Marara Technical College,
requested that Ms D Motle, the Administrative Officer, investigate how the Open Learning
bursary scheme worked, the progress on students’ applications, and inconsistencies in the
awarding of funds to students at the Technical College. The full report, including
recommendations, was to be submitted to the Student Support Manager by 30 May 2026.

2. PROCEDURES
The following procedures were followed to gather relevant information.

2.1 The Chief Financial Officer of the Open Learning Bursary scheme, Ms Owen, was
consulted to establish the criteria followed in selecting eligible students for funding, and the
progress made on processing applications.
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 81 278 3372



QUESTION 1: INVESTIGATIVE REPORT (3 Different Answers Provided)

REPORT ON AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE OPEN
LEARNING BURSARY SCHEME AT MARARA TECHNICAL COLLEGE IN
TOEMASKOP

1. TERMS OF REFERENCE

On 1 May 2026, Ms Thando Morule, Student Support Manager at Marara Technical
College, requested that Ms D Motle, the Administrative Officer, investigate how the
Open Learning bursary scheme worked, the progress on students’ applications, and
inconsistencies in the awarding of funds to students at the Technical College. The
full report, including recommendations, was to be submitted to the Student Support
Manager by 30 May 2026.

2. PROCEDURES
The following procedures were followed to gather relevant information.

2.1 The Chief Financial Officer of the Open Learning Bursary scheme, Ms Owen,
was consulted to establish the criteria followed in selecting eligible students for
funding, and the progress made on processing applications.

2.2 A meeting was held with ten Student Representative Council leaders to establish
how the students were affected by challenges of the bursary scheme and how they
could be assisted.

2.3 Questionnaires were administered to students at all levels of the college
programmes to establish which groups were severely affected by inconsistencies in
the allocation of bursary funds.

2.4 Three Student Representative Council members, a representative from the
college finance office, and the Open Learning bursary scheme manager held
discussions at the local radio station to establish ways of addressing students’
funding issues.

3. FINDINGS

3.1 Consultation with the Chief Financial Officer

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

Connected book
 image
James Schofield Workplace English
Publisher: 2012 ISBN: 9780007463008 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
May 23, 2025
File latest updated on
October 10, 2026
Number of pages
8
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00
Purchased by 99 students

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal
4,2
(14545)
Sold
155268
Followers
36029
Items
5287
Last sold
2 hours ago

Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions