• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages
Exam (elaborations)

SUS1501 Assignment 7 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the SUS1501 Assignment 7 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025. For assistance whats-app us on 0.6.8..8.1.2..0.9.3.4.. Step 1: Set the scene To set the scene for this assessment we want you to first try andestimate your own ecological footprint. There are probably many ecological footprint calculators on the webbut we suggest this one because the data used in the graphs youhave just seen is sourced from the same site: If this one doesn't work, you can just google "ecological footprintcalculator" and I'm sure you will find another one. Step 2: Write a comment about your footprint Right, now that you have an idea of what your ecological footprint is,you are going to do what you have done in most of the assessmentsup until now. You are going to post a comment (4 or 5 paragraphsthis time) in the discussion forum below. Sounds simple enough right? Well yes and no. FORUM Assessment 7 - 541324  Your answer must contain all of the following parts: Part A You need to say something about your footprint based on what youhave just read in the "Sustainability?" section. How do you feel aboutthis result? Part B Next we want you to think back to your previous assessment,assessment 06. In that assignment that dealt with saving the rhino,we asked you to think about the essentially virtue ethics questions of:"So where do I fit in in this?" In light of what you have discovered in this assessment in relation toyour own ecological footprint - i.e. your own engagement with nature- we want you to critically reflect on the answer to the "So where do Ifit in in this?" question that you submitted in assessment 06. Do you think that the answer might need some adjustment or are youstill happy that it is an accurate and truthful reflection on your arête ? Part C - counts 60% of the total grade Finally, the technical part is that we also want you to think about yourecological footprint from the perspective of some of the stuff youlearned about in the ethics core. In particular we want you to thinkback on three of the traditions: - " Do the right thing - Deontology" - Here we want you to thinkabout the sustainability problem from the perspective of Kant's categorical imperative (see Kant do it! ); - “ Fair’s Fair - Distributive Justice ” – here you need to thinkabout what is fair for our children - for future generations - using Rawls' principle of equality of fair opportunity specifically(see How to share .... John Rawls () ) - "Greenies - Environmental Ethics" - we want you to considerthe issues we have just outlined from an anthropocentric position specifically. Remember we must be able to see from your use of these that youhave actually understood the theory in question (the categoricalimperative, the veil of ignorance, and anthropocentric thinking). If wedon't see this you will not pass this assessment.

Content preview

SUS1501
Assignment 7 Semester 1 2025

Unique number: 541324

Due Date: 22 April 2025


This document includes:

 Helpful answers and guidelines
 Detailed explanations and/ or calculations
 References




Connect with the tutor on

+27 68 812 0934

, © Study Shack 2025. All rights Reserved +27 68 812 0934

Connected book
 image
Paul Collier, John Kay Greed Is Dead
Publisher: 2020 ISBN: 9780141994178 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
March 25, 2025
Number of pages
12
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
StudyShack
4,1
(1833)
Sold
31092
Followers
13941
Items
2089
Last sold
1 day ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions