100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

LRM2601 Assignment 6 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 6 November 2024 Course Labour Relations Management: Macro (LRM2601)

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
26
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
06-11-2024
Written in
2024/2025

LRM2601 Assignment 6 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 - DUE 6 November 2024 Course Labour Relations Management: Macro (LRM2601)











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
November 6, 2024
Number of pages
26
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

LRM2601


Assignment 6 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 -
DUE 6 November 2024

,Read the case study and then answer the questions that follow. A TOUGH SITUATION

AT GOLDEN WHEELS TRANSPORT SERVICES Sipho is a young, ambitious man pursuing
a Diploma in Logistics Management through a part-time programme at the University of

South Africa. As the primary breadwinner for his family, he supports his younger sister,
who is still in school, and his mother, a former domestic worker now unable to work due

to severe arthritis. Recently, Sipho secured a job as a junior dispatcher at Golden Wheels
Transport Services, a Johannesburg-based logistics company specialising in transporting

goods across South Africa.




QUERY 1




1.1 Instance of Perceived Distributive Injustice: A particular illustration of distributive
injustice in this case is the reduction of employees' overtime compensation, a

substantial component of their income, while senior managers, including Mr. Mkhize,
persist in receiving annual bonuses despite the company's financial difficulties.

The equity criteria assesses fairness by examining the proportional relationship between

people' contributions and their corresponding benefits. Employees perceive this move
as inequitable, as they work extended hours and depend on overtime for financial

stability, yet are deprived of this crucial revenue while senior managers earn bonuses.
This disparity in compensation compromises the perceived equity of income distribution

within the organization, as individuals reliant on overtime wages are disadvantaged,
while senior staff continue to enjoy supplementary benefits.

, 1.2 Illustration of Perceived Procedural Injustice: An instance of procedural injustice

occurs when Mr. Mkhize convened a meeting to elucidate the decrease of overtime yet
prohibited employees from posing questions, offering recommendations, or

deliberating alternate cost-saving measures. Furthermore, when Sipho suggested
investigating alternative methods to minimize expenses without impacting overtime, Mr.

Mkhize categorically rejected his proposal.




Clarification Utilizing Procedural Justice Standards:




Representativeness: This criterion mandates that all stakeholders affected by a decision
must have their perspectives taken into account during the decision-making process.

Mr. Mkhize prohibited employees from expressing their ideas or suggesting alternatives
during the discussion, thereby neglecting to represent their interests in the decision-

making process. The absence of representation caused employees to view the process
as dismissive and inequitable.

Bias Suppression: Bias suppression necessitates that decision-makers refrain from

prejudice and personal biases. In this instance, Mr. Mkhize exhibited partiality towards
senior management by neglecting the employees' requirement for overtime

compensation while maintaining bonuses for upper-level executives. His dismissive
reaction to employees' proposals and concerns indicates a bias toward management,

exacerbating employees' view of an inequitable and unilateral procedure.




1.3 Clarification of Perceived Injustice and Its Effect on Trust: Mr. Mkhize's actions
were regarded as unjust due to his reduction of vital income for employees and his

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
masterstudy University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1818
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
74
Documents
6440
Last sold
6 days ago

4,6

289 reviews

5
229
4
33
3
13
2
8
1
6

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions