IRM1501
SEMESTER TWO
ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS
UNIQUE NUMBER: 193286
ASSIGNMENT NO 1
Discuss plagiarism and provide examples where necessary.
(10 MARKS)
Copyright infringement is the demonstration of utilizing another person's work, thoughts, or words
without appropriate attribution or assent and introducing it as one's own. It is a significant offense in
scholar and expert settings as it disregards the standards of respectability, genuineness, and
protected innovation. There are a few types of literary theft, including:
1. Direct Literary theft: This includes duplicating in exactly the same words from a source without
legitimate reference. For instance, on the off chance that an understudy duplicates a section from a
site and glues it into their exposition without utilizing quotes or refering to the source, it would be
viewed as immediate counterfeiting.
2. Self-Counterfeiting: This happens when an individual presents their own work that they have
recently distributed or submitted for one more task without legitimate affirmation. For example, in
the event that a scientist reuses huge parts of their past paper in another distribution without
refering to the first work, it is viewed as self-counterfeiting.
3. Mosaic Literary theft: This includes sorting out data from different sources to make another work
without appropriate references. For instance, on the off chance that an understudy consolidates
data from different sites and articles without crediting the sources, it would be viewed as mosaic
copyright infringement.
4. Coincidental Copyright infringement: This happens when an individual incidentally neglects to
refer to or appropriately reword a source because of an absence of comprehension of scholastic
shows. For example, in the event that an understudy unexpectedly neglects to remember references
for their paper, it very well may be viewed as unintentional counterfeiting. Literary theft has serious
outcomes, including scholastic punishments like bombing a course or being removed from a
program, lawful repercussions for copyright encroachment, and harm to one's scholar and expert
standing. It is fundamental for people to comprehend the significance of legitimate attribution and
refering to sources to try not to incidentally commit counterfeiting.
SEMESTER TWO
ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS
UNIQUE NUMBER: 193286
ASSIGNMENT NO 1
Discuss plagiarism and provide examples where necessary.
(10 MARKS)
Copyright infringement is the demonstration of utilizing another person's work, thoughts, or words
without appropriate attribution or assent and introducing it as one's own. It is a significant offense in
scholar and expert settings as it disregards the standards of respectability, genuineness, and
protected innovation. There are a few types of literary theft, including:
1. Direct Literary theft: This includes duplicating in exactly the same words from a source without
legitimate reference. For instance, on the off chance that an understudy duplicates a section from a
site and glues it into their exposition without utilizing quotes or refering to the source, it would be
viewed as immediate counterfeiting.
2. Self-Counterfeiting: This happens when an individual presents their own work that they have
recently distributed or submitted for one more task without legitimate affirmation. For example, in
the event that a scientist reuses huge parts of their past paper in another distribution without
refering to the first work, it is viewed as self-counterfeiting.
3. Mosaic Literary theft: This includes sorting out data from different sources to make another work
without appropriate references. For instance, on the off chance that an understudy consolidates
data from different sites and articles without crediting the sources, it would be viewed as mosaic
copyright infringement.
4. Coincidental Copyright infringement: This happens when an individual incidentally neglects to
refer to or appropriately reword a source because of an absence of comprehension of scholastic
shows. For example, in the event that an understudy unexpectedly neglects to remember references
for their paper, it very well may be viewed as unintentional counterfeiting. Literary theft has serious
outcomes, including scholastic punishments like bombing a course or being removed from a
program, lawful repercussions for copyright encroachment, and harm to one's scholar and expert
standing. It is fundamental for people to comprehend the significance of legitimate attribution and
refering to sources to try not to incidentally commit counterfeiting.
