100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

PLS2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (730417)

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
15
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
25-03-2024
Written in
2023/2024

PLS2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (Unique Nr. 730417) ... 100 % TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on +/ 2/ 5/ 4 /7 /7 /9 /5 /4 /0 /1 /3 /2 . QUESTION 1: SHORT QUESTIONS: Instructions for Question 1: Write short answers for each question. The number alongside each question is the total mark for the question. 1.1 What is the difference between dogma and a critically reasoned argument? [write 3-4 sentences] (4 marks) 1.2 What is an implicit conclusion in an argument? [write 2-3 sentences] (2 marks) 1.3 What is the difference between a premise indicator and a conclusion indicator of an argument? Give an example of an argument in which you can show where these indicators are. [write 3-4 sentences] (4 marks) 1.4 State the kind of writing found in each of the following statements: 1.4.1 For Kwasi Wiredu, the basic characteristic of folk philosophy is that it contains bald, non-discursive assertions which are not supported by argument. (2 marks) 1.4.2 As for Thabo, after passing matric in 1975 he got a job as an unqualified teacher at Thoko-Thaba secondary school, then got married in his second year of teaching. After a year or two he obtained a mortgaged house through United bank in Thokoza Gardens. (2 marks) 1.4.3 The term ‘oral’ refers to spoken words, to verbal expressions of thoughts in different ways and styles. (2 marks) Downloaded by Thomas Mboya () lOMoARcPSD| 3 1.5 What kind of definitions are in each of the following statements? 1.5.1 ‘Tigon’ is taken to mean the offspring of a male tiger and a female lion. (2 marks) 1.5.2 ‘Psychiatry’ means the fortuitous melding of modern medicine with psychology that promises relief to thousands of poor, desperate souls who suffer the pains of emotional disorder. (2 marks) 1.5.3 ‘Intractable’ means not easily governed; obstinate; unruly; not disposed to be taught. (2 marks) 1.6 State whether the following pieces of writings are mere sentences or propositions (statements) in logical terms. 1.6.1 The Netherlands is smaller than Belgium as far as population is concerned. (2 marks) 1.6.2 Every triangle has three sides and three angles. (2 marks) 1.6.3 ‘Better be safe than sorry’ (2 marks) 1.6.4 ‘Mary, please come here! (2 marks) 1.6.5 Aristotle was educated in Africa. (2 marks) 1.7 Give the Name of the formal or informal fallacy found in each of the following arguments: 1.7.1 If students study hard, then they will pass their exams. Apparently, students did not study hard. Therefore, we can conclude that they will not pass their exams.(1 mark) 1.7.2 The Law ought to be hard on men who abuse women for the reason that these men are women abusers. (1 mark) 1.7.3 When I was touring South Africa, I met three white people on different occasions who displayed some racist attitude to people of African descent. It seems to me that all white people in South Africa are racist. (1 mark) 1.7.4 “Did you see how the EFF political party members conducted themselves in parliament lately? They were screaming and shouting and climbing on top of the tables. This is disgusting, and it does not matter what points they were raising. As civilized people we cannot allow ourselves to be ruled by barbaric people. Clearly, we should not vote for the EFF in 2024 general elections.” (1 mark) [36] Downloaded by Thomas Mboya () lOMoARcPSD| 4 QUESTION 2: ARGUMENT EVALUATION: Instructions for Question 2: 1. Evaluate the following three arguments. 2. In your evaluation, state whether the argument is inductive or deductive, value or empirical, contains a fallacy or not (stipulate which fallacy if it contains one) and whether it is valid/invalid or sound/unsound or strong/weak. 3. Present your responses on how you have evaluated the three arguments in the form of a table. The table is provided below after the three arguments: Argument 2.1 It is not wrong to kill spiders (not A). But if spiders have eternal souls (B), then it is wrong to kill them (A). Thus, it is false that spiders have eternal souls (not B). Argument 2.2 The work of a garbage collector is of great importance (1). The pay is good and the hours are reasonable (2). So, your reluctance to take this job is beyond comprehension (3). Argument 2.3 All black people are African people (a), and all Zulu speaking people are black people (b). Hence, all Zulu speaking people are African people (c). Table in which to provide your answers is here below. But you can also draw your own table. [marks 1x12=12] Inductive or Deductive Value or empirical Fallacy? If ‘Yes,’ which? Valid / invalid or sound / unsound Argument 2.1 Argument 2.2 Argument 2.3 Downloaded by Thomas Mboya () lOMoARcPSD| 5 QUESTION 3: ARGUMENT MAPS/DIAGRAMS: Instructions for Question 3: Create argument maps/argument diagrams of the following arguments. Example: Human beings are buried respectfully after they have died (a). When they are sick, we do everything to save their lives (b). Therefore, human beings are dignified creatures (c). Argument map/diagram a b c Be sure that you number the statements as they are labelled in the questions. 3.1 Lying causes social discord (A). Hence lying is wrong (B). (3 marks) 3.2 It is foolish to live in a modern city (1), because in the modern city the pace of life is inhuman (2); the crime rate is high (3); the air quality is often poor (4); and the traffic is dangerous (5). (5 marks) 3.3 If alcoholism is a disease, then it is treated medically (a). But alcoholism is not treated medically (b). So, alcoholism is not a disease (c). (4 marks) [12] [60 MARKS]

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 25, 2024
Number of pages
15
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

PLS2601
ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2024

, lOMoARcPSD|21997160




CRITICAL REASONING
PLS2601


* SEMESTER 1 *



Assignment 2



Instructions:


1. This assignment consists of short questions.
2. Be guided by the allotted marks as to the length of each answer.
3. The questions are based on Lessons 4, 5 and 6.
4. Please submit this assignment as a file.
5. When you utilise other sources in order to complete your assignment, please provide appropriate
intext and bibliographical information following the prescribed format given in Tutorial Letter 301.
6. Please include a plagiarism declaration with your assignment.
7. The unique number for this assignment is 730417.



Additional student instructions

1. NO emailed assignment scripts will be accepted.
2. Students are advised to preview submissions (answer scripts) to ensure legibility and that the correct
answer script file has been uploaded.

3. Students are permitted to resubmit their answer scripts should their initial submission be unsatisfactory,
provided the submission is within the allowable time (not later than the submission date).
4. Incorrect file format and uncollated answer scripts will not be considered.
5. Incorrect answer scripts and/or submissions made on unofficial platforms will not be marked and no
opportunity will be granted for resubmission.
6. A mark awarded for incomplete submission will be the student’s final mark. No opportunity for
resubmission will be granted.
7. A mark awarded for illegible scanned submission will be the student’s final mark. No opportunity for
resubmission will be granted.
8. Submissions will only be accepted from registered student accounts.

9. Students must complete the declaration of own work when submitting. Students suspected of plagiarism
will be subjected to disciplinary processes. Plagiarism is a violation of academic integrity, and students
who do plagiarise or copy verbatim from published work will be in violation of the Policy on Academic
Integrity and the Student Disciplinary Code and may be referred to disciplinary hearing. Unisa has a zero
tolerance for plagiarism and/or any other forms of academic dishonesty.


1

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LIBRARYpro University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
10509
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
4904
Documents
4809
Last sold
3 days ago
LIBRARY

On this page, you find all documents, Package Deals, and Flashcards offered by seller LIBRARYpro (LIBRARY). Knowledge is Power. #You already got my attention!

3,7

1453 reviews

5
680
4
234
3
243
2
78
1
218

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions