100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Study guide

Epistemology

Rating
5,0
(1)
Sold
-
Pages
11
Uploaded on
19-07-2018
Written in
2017/2018

This document focuses on the study of knowledge the topics it includes are: 1. Scepticism - Descartes, Hume, Kant, Russell, Moore, Wittgenstein 2. The Relationship between truth, justification and belief - Foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism 3. Knowledge of the External World and Theories of Perception - Locke, Russell, Berkeley, Mill, Ayer

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

Epistemology

Sceptcism:
Why Philosophers have raised doubts about the success of
both R + E in Understanding the World:
Ratonalism:
Descartes (illustrated under following heading)
Strengths Weaknesses
 Certainty – we can ‘k’ the Cogito  Limits how much we can ‘k’ as we cannot ‘k’
anything from xp
 Hume
 Problem of Language

Success of ratooaalss ls alslted because of the alslted koowaedge we cao have uoder Descartes
ratooaalss whlch seess locosaatbae wlth the worad

Empiricism:
Strengths Weaknesses
 More liberal account of ‘k’ (we can ‘k’ more  Sceptcism (Descartes)
bc empirical ‘k’ is ‘k’)
 Rejecton of innateness  Kant: empiricism alone cannot create
structure (need the mind)
 Simpler theory than innateism (Aristotle  Problem of Inducton (due to Maters of
critque of Plato) Fact)
 Hume’s colour-blue counter-example (from
his Copy Principle)
The success of esalrlclss ls alslted because of the weakoesses that derlve fros Huse’s esalrlclss

Hume:
 Copy Principle  all ‘k’ has to have a corresponding impression  so we doubt the self, the
external world and the concept of cause+efect
 Colour Blue Counterexample  undermines noton that ‘k’ comes from xp  undermines the
Copy Principle
 Fork  MoF + RoI
 MoF  founded on C + E  Problem of inducton  to defend it you argue inductvely so MoF
not a reliable source of ‘k’

The Role of Philosophical Doubt:
Descartes:
3 Sceptcal Arguments:

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 19, 2018
Number of pages
11
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Study guide

Subjects

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
5 year ago

5,0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
sammizandt The University of Warwick
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
194
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
119
Documents
94
Last sold
1 week ago

I have completed alevels and so have uploaded all my notes for those exams: English Literature - Pearson - English Lit from 2015 Philosophy - Cambridge Pre-U History A - OCR - Most recent version

4,1

55 reviews

5
26
4
16
3
7
2
2
1
4

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions