Mashamplani's dismissal appears to raise potential legal and constitutional issues, particularly regarding her pregnancy and her rights as an employee. To evaluate the fairness of her dismissal, we should consider relevant provisions of the Constitution, the Employment Equity Act (EEA), the Labour Relations Act (LRA), and applicable case law. 1. **Constitutional Considerations**: - The South African Constitution prohibits discrimination on several grounds, including sex, gender, and pregnancy. - Section 9 of the Constitution guarantees equality, and Section 10 protects the right to dignity. - Mashamplani, as a gay woman, is also protected against discrimination based on her sexual orientation. 2. **Employment Equity Act (EEA)**: - The EEA aims to promote equal opportunities and fair treatment in employment. - It prohibits unfair discrimination, including on the grounds of pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender. - Mashamplani's dismissal based on her pregnancy could potentially be seen as unfair discrimination. 3. **Labour Relations Act (LRA)**: - The LRA governs labor relations in South Africa, including dismissals. - Section 187 of the LRA sets out the grounds for a fair dismissal, which should include a fair reason and a fair procedure. - Dismissing an employee solely due to pregnancy without just cause may be considered an unfair dismissal. 4. **Case Law**: - Relevant case law, such as the Du Plessis v De Kock case, has established that discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy constitutes unfair discrimination. In Mashamplani's case, Brar Yarca's claim that he employed her based on an implied promise that she would never become pregnant may not hold up under scrutiny. This could be seen as discriminatory based on her gender, pregnancy, and possibly her sexual orientation. To assess the fairness of her dismissal, a court would consider whether Brar Yarca had a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for terminating her employment, whether he followed due process in dismissal, and whether the dismissal was proportionate to any misconduct (if any existed). Given the facts presented, it is likely that her dismissal would be considered unfair and discriminatory under South African law. Mashamplani may have grounds to challenge her dismissal, potentially seeking reinstatement, compensation, or other appropriate remedies through labor dispute resolution mechanisms or legal action, citing violations of her constitutional rights, the EEA, and the LRA.
Welcome to Mr Ace that exam, where we aim to meet your shortcomings in respect of you academic life. You don't need to spend an arm and leg for you to ace your studies. Your can trust our study materials which provides 100% pass
Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.
No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.
No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.
“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”
