100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Admin - What is Admin Action Topic 2 notes

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
13
Uploaded on
02-06-2023
Written in
2022/2023

Notes covering Topic 2 for Admin Law WITS 2023










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
3
Uploaded on
June 2, 2023
Number of pages
13
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Summary

Content preview

Administrative law – LAWS4063A

Topic 2: Administrative Action (Including the Principle of Legality)



Prescribed Reading:

• Quinot (2020): Chapter 3 (70-101)
• President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v South African Rugby Football
Union and Others (CCT16/98) [1999] ZACC 11; 2000 (1) SA 1; 1999 (10) BCLR 1059 (10
September 1999) esp para 143 (260 paras)
• Permanent Secretary of the Department of Education of the Government of the
Eastern Cape Province and Another v Ed-U-College (PE) (Section21) [2000] ZACC 23;
2001 (2) SA 1 (CC); 2001 (2) BCLR 118 (CC) (29 November 2000) esp para 18 (25 paras)
• Minister of Defence and Military Veterans v Motau and Others [2014] ZACC 18; 2014
(8) BCLR 930 (CC); 2014 (5) SA 69 (CC) (10 June 2014) esp paras 26-51 and fn 28 (129
paras)
• AAA Investments (Proprietary) Limited v Micro Finance Regulatory Council and
Another [2006] ZACC 9; 2006 (11) BCLR 1255 (CC); 2007 (1) SA 343 (CC) (28 July 2006)
esp paras 39-45 (Yacoob J) and 119-121 (O’Regan J) (155 paras)
• Calibre Clinical Consultants (Pty) Ltd v National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight
Industry [2010] ZASCA 94; 2010 (5) SA 457 (SCA); [2010] 4 All SA 561 (SCA) (19 July
2010) (64 paras)
• Grey’s Marine Hout Bay (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Public Works [2005] ZASCA 43; [2005] 3
All SA 33 (SCA); 2005 (6) SA 313 (SCA) (13 May 2005) (36 paras)
• Joseph v City of Johannesburg 2010 (4) SA 55 (CC), esp paras 27-30 [2009] ZACC 30;
2010 (3) BCLR 212 (CC); 2010 (4) SA 55 (CC) (9 October 2009) (78 paras)
• Cape Metropolitan Council v Metro Inspection Services Western Cape CC and Others
(10/99) [2001] ZASCA 56 (30 March 2001)



Learning Outcomes:

• Explain the meaning and content of the constitutional right to just administrative
action.
• Explain the meaning and content of the right to just administrative action in terms of
PAJA.
• Explain and critique the definition of administrative action with reference to PAJA.
• Apply and interpret the meaning of administrative action with reference to its
components.
• Explain the meaning, scope and application of the principle of legality.


Page 1 of 13

, 3.1 Introduction

➢ Admin action must be present for admin law to be applied
 S33 and PAJA only apply to admin action
 1st Q to admin law inquiry = is there admin action?


3.2 Separation of powers and classification of state functions

➢ SoP = useful ref point for contextualising and describing admin action

➢ I.t.o. SoP state institutions and functions classified as – executive, legislative & judicial
 Not completely sep in practice due to checks and balances

➢ Executive power: - most often
• Derived from C
• Exercised @ national, provincial & local level (federal)
• Formulation of policy (not AA) & implementation of legislation (AA)
• Exec func not automatically admin action
➢ Legislative power:
• Derived from C
• Exercised @ national, provincial & local level (federal)
• Creation of legislation
• Legislative acts not automatically admin action
➢ Judicial power:
• Unitary
• Derived from C
• Exercise of judicial function not AA

➢ SoP cannot say which functions are AA
 Any of the 3 branches’ actions could qualify as AA → more nuanced approach
required

➢ Note:
• Executive has dual nature
 President & cabinet: formulates of policy
 Public administration: implements policy & legislation
• Thus exec as institutional whole not indicator of presence of admin action

 Classification NOT very useful Ultimately question whether qualifies as AA more
nuanced → could be any of the 3 above
 Def of AA usually associated w. implementation of legislation (Executive)

Page 2 of 13

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
SilkeHinz University of the Witwatersrand
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
18
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
12
Documents
22
Last sold
1 year ago

1,0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions