• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 34 pages
Other

Assignment 3 Hrbus83

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 34 pages

Provides structure and context on how to complete the assignment. received scores of plus 70%

Content preview

University of South Africa
FORM 1: 2022
AMENDED FOR HRBUS83/2022

ETHICAL CLEARANCE SIMULATION
Research ethics application form for conducting research involving either
primary, or a combination of primary and secondary human participant data.

For research that involves the explicit use of secondary data, please complete
form 2.

Please contact Dr Stander should you require form 2.

TOTAL MARKS: 100



a. The proposed study involves human participants YES NO

X

a.1 Directly through the collection of primary data X

a.2 Both directly and indirectly through the secondary use of data (If X
secondary data is the main data source, please complete Form 2,
Secondary Data Application)

b. Collecting personal or confidential information X

c. UNISA employees, students or data X

d. Potential conflicts of interest (real or perceived) could arise during X
the course of the research



PRIVACY INFORMATION:

The personal information you provide on this form is collected for the primary purpose of
assessing your research ethics application. This personal information will be entered into a
database to assist with administration, correspondence, and statistical analyses. Office
bearers of the Ethics Review Committee as well as the HRBUS83/2022 Team that will
process this application have access to these records. Records will be made available to
authorised third parties should the need arise such as the National Health Research Ethics
Council (NHREC) and Unisa structures such as the Unisa Research Ethics Review



1
2019_ERC_Human Participant Application Form 1, V 3 (SRIPCC 14 /02/19); V2 (Approved by URERC 3 Feb 2017; V1
approved 27 June 2016) _ AMENDED FOR HRBUS83_ETHICAL CLEARANCE SIMULATION

,Committee (URERC). All records will be retained for as long as necessary to achieve the
purpose for which it was collected.




2
2019_ERC_Human Participant Application Form 1, V 3 (SRIPCC 14 /02/19); V2 (Approved by URERC 3 Feb 2017; V1
approved 27 June 2016) _ AMENDED FOR HRBUS83_ETHICAL CLEARANCE SIMULATION

,TEAM MEMBER RATING


Student number Surname Contribution out of 45




Use the following scale to rate the contribution of each team member.



5 = Excellent, 4 = Good, 3 = Acceptable, 2 = Marginal, 1 = Unacceptable

How to determine the contribution?

Student number of
team member

Attended team meetings
(online or otherwise)

Was punctual

Was willing to listen to others

Gave the project a high
priority and willingly accepted
responsibilities

Helped to identify and clarify
problems

Was willing to discuss
disagreements and adapt, if
necessary

Helped to make sure that
everyone understood the
solution

Completed assigned tasks as
promised and on time




3
2019_ERC_Human Participant Application Form 1, V 3 (SRIPCC 14 /02/19); V2 (Approved by URERC 3 Feb 2017; V1
approved 27 June 2016) _ AMENDED FOR HRBUS83_ETHICAL CLEARANCE SIMULATION

, Saw what had to be done
and did it without prompting
or pressure

TOTAL

MAXIMUM




4
2019_ERC_Human Participant Application Form 1, V 3 (SRIPCC 14 /02/19); V2 (Approved by URERC 3 Feb 2017; V1
approved 27 June 2016) _ AMENDED FOR HRBUS83_ETHICAL CLEARANCE SIMULATION

Document information

Uploaded on
February 9, 2023
File latest updated on
April 3, 2023
Number of pages
34
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
R350,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
jasen5
3,1
(7)
Sold
28
Followers
22
Items
13
Last sold
1 year ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions