Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages
Exam (elaborations)

LML4806 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2022

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages

This document contains solutions for LML4806 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2022

Content preview

LML4806
ASSIGNMENT 1
SEMESTER 2 – 2022

, Zelda is an executive director and chief executive officer (CEO) of Pristine
Estates Ltd (Pristine). Velaphi has been serving as a non-executive director and
chairperson of the board of directors of Pristine since 2010.

AGI Group Limited (AGI) recently increased its shareholding in Pristine to 50.1%
of the issued ordinary shares. Consequently, AGI directly holds 50.1% of the
general voting rights associated with the issued shares of Pristine. Realty (Pty)
Ltd (Realty), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AGI, holds 2% of the ordinary shares
issued by Pristine.

AGI and Realty subsequently delivered a written and signed demand to Pristine
to call a shareholders’ meeting for the purposes of considering and approving
the resolutions to:

1. Remove Zelda as an executive director and CEO of Pristine;
2. Remove Velaphi as a non-executive director and chairperson of the board
of directors of Pristine;
3. Elect Muthu (who is currently an executive director of Realty) as an
executive director and CEO of Pristine; and
4. Elect Sunelle (who is currently an executive director of AGI) as a non-
executive director and chairperson of the board of directors of Pristine.

Following extensive discussions, the board of directors of Pristine has resolved
to convene a meeting of the shareholders of Pristine for the purposes of
consideration and approval of the above resolutions.

Zelda and Velaphi approach you for legal advice. They are of the view that AGI
and Realty did not have the right to demand that Pristine call a shareholders’
meeting and that the demand submitted by AGI and Realty to that effect was
was invalid. They believe that the other directors of Pristine merely succumbed
to the pressure from AGI and Realty and that, in the circumstances, there was
no legal obligation on the Pristine board to call a shareholders’ meeting to
consider the resolutions proposed by AGI and Realty. They further indicate that,
in their view, AGI and Realty do not have any right or power to remove them
from the board of Pristine.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 12, 2022
Number of pages
6
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Studyexcel1
3,7
(54)
Sold
390
Followers
296
Items
0
Last sold
1 year ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions