MRL3701
ASSESSMENT 1
SEMESTER 2 – 2022
, QUESTION:
Explain why the court in Ex Parte Arntzen (Nedbank Ltd as Intervening Creditor)
2013 (1) SA 49 (KZP) held that creditors are more vulnerable in voluntary
surrender applications than in compulsory sequestration which then gives rise
to the requirement of a higher level of disclosure.
TOTAL FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: [10]
ASSESSMENT 1
SEMESTER 2 – 2022
, QUESTION:
Explain why the court in Ex Parte Arntzen (Nedbank Ltd as Intervening Creditor)
2013 (1) SA 49 (KZP) held that creditors are more vulnerable in voluntary
surrender applications than in compulsory sequestration which then gives rise
to the requirement of a higher level of disclosure.
TOTAL FOR ASSIGNMENT 01: [10]
