Elite Academic Institute 068 053 8213 /0717 513 14/ 061 262 1185
ademic In
Ac sti
te
tu
Eli
te
W
er
de
a
h
eG M
raduates Ar e
Educating the world for a better change
,Elite Academic Institute 068 053 8213 /0717 513 14/ 061 262 1185
WARNING: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLAGIARISM IS A SERIOUS ACADEMIC
OFFENSE, therefore, the documents provided here including past assignments, tests
and notes are intended SOLELY for educational purposes and as a guide to help
students understand academic concepts and improve their writing skills. These
materials should not be submitted as final work, as doing so may constitute academic
dishonesty. Students are encouraged to use them as reference points, develop their
own understanding and produce original work that reflects their knowledge and critical
thinking. Students are also encouraged to regenerate their own (personalized)
solutions paying particular attention to module contents as prescribed by module
facilitators, lecturers and supervisors. If this document is plagiarized by the users and
fails, ELITE ACADEMIC INSTITUTE should not be rendered accountable since the
contents in this document only give learners a kick-start on what is expected of them
from their areas of specialty.
CAUTION: STUDENTS ARE NOT MANDATED TO USE ALL THE INFORMATION IN
THIS DOCUMENT IN WRITING THEIR ASSIGNMENT
Educating the world for a better change
,UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA (UNISA)
PRM3701: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
, QUESTION 1: Discussion Participation & Collaborative Learning Reflection
Discussion Activity 1: Strategic Stakeholder Communication & Crisis Response in
Complex Infrastructure
EVIDENCE ATTACHMENT BOX 1: DISCUSSION ACTIVITY 1 SCREENSHOTS
[SCREENSHOT EVIDENCE PLACEHOLDER 1A: Original Forum Contribution]
Discussion Topic: Strategic Stakeholder Engagement & Crisis Communication in Private
Healthcare Infrastructure
Content Summary: Analysis of Johannesburg Surgical Hospital (JSH) stakeholder
mapping along Beyers Naudé Drive, applying PMBOK 6th Edition (PMI 2017: 504-535),
Global Infrastructure Hub (2020) communication matrix, and Park University (2020) crisis
communication steps.
[SCREENSHOT EVIDENCE PLACEHOLDER 1B: Collaborative Peer Response &
Knowledge Exchange]
Peer Interactor: Discussion Peer & Moderator Feedback
Content Summary: Dialogue evaluating the balance between technical municipal
reporting and community noise/traffic mitigation, incorporating Finance Alliance (2021)
5-step model and Wrike (2021) four stakeholder strategies.
1. Focus and Purpose of the Discussion Activity
The primary purpose of Discussion Activity 1 was to critically evaluate how project
managers formulate proactive stakeholder engagement plans and crisis communication
strategies during high-stakes construction and health infrastructure projects (Global
Infrastructure Hub, 2020:3-8; Caltrans, 2021:14-22). Grounded in the Stakeholder
Management Knowledge (PMI, 2017:504), the activity required students to analyze real-
world infrastructure scenarios where public anxiety, municipal traffic disruptions,
ademic In
Ac sti
te
tu
Eli
te
W
er
de
a
h
eG M
raduates Ar e
Educating the world for a better change
,Elite Academic Institute 068 053 8213 /0717 513 14/ 061 262 1185
WARNING: PLEASE NOTE THAT PLAGIARISM IS A SERIOUS ACADEMIC
OFFENSE, therefore, the documents provided here including past assignments, tests
and notes are intended SOLELY for educational purposes and as a guide to help
students understand academic concepts and improve their writing skills. These
materials should not be submitted as final work, as doing so may constitute academic
dishonesty. Students are encouraged to use them as reference points, develop their
own understanding and produce original work that reflects their knowledge and critical
thinking. Students are also encouraged to regenerate their own (personalized)
solutions paying particular attention to module contents as prescribed by module
facilitators, lecturers and supervisors. If this document is plagiarized by the users and
fails, ELITE ACADEMIC INSTITUTE should not be rendered accountable since the
contents in this document only give learners a kick-start on what is expected of them
from their areas of specialty.
CAUTION: STUDENTS ARE NOT MANDATED TO USE ALL THE INFORMATION IN
THIS DOCUMENT IN WRITING THEIR ASSIGNMENT
Educating the world for a better change
,UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA (UNISA)
PRM3701: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
, QUESTION 1: Discussion Participation & Collaborative Learning Reflection
Discussion Activity 1: Strategic Stakeholder Communication & Crisis Response in
Complex Infrastructure
EVIDENCE ATTACHMENT BOX 1: DISCUSSION ACTIVITY 1 SCREENSHOTS
[SCREENSHOT EVIDENCE PLACEHOLDER 1A: Original Forum Contribution]
Discussion Topic: Strategic Stakeholder Engagement & Crisis Communication in Private
Healthcare Infrastructure
Content Summary: Analysis of Johannesburg Surgical Hospital (JSH) stakeholder
mapping along Beyers Naudé Drive, applying PMBOK 6th Edition (PMI 2017: 504-535),
Global Infrastructure Hub (2020) communication matrix, and Park University (2020) crisis
communication steps.
[SCREENSHOT EVIDENCE PLACEHOLDER 1B: Collaborative Peer Response &
Knowledge Exchange]
Peer Interactor: Discussion Peer & Moderator Feedback
Content Summary: Dialogue evaluating the balance between technical municipal
reporting and community noise/traffic mitigation, incorporating Finance Alliance (2021)
5-step model and Wrike (2021) four stakeholder strategies.
1. Focus and Purpose of the Discussion Activity
The primary purpose of Discussion Activity 1 was to critically evaluate how project
managers formulate proactive stakeholder engagement plans and crisis communication
strategies during high-stakes construction and health infrastructure projects (Global
Infrastructure Hub, 2020:3-8; Caltrans, 2021:14-22). Grounded in the Stakeholder
Management Knowledge (PMI, 2017:504), the activity required students to analyze real-
world infrastructure scenarios where public anxiety, municipal traffic disruptions,
