, CPR3701 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2026
DUE DATE: 31 AUGUST 2026
1. Whether X may be charged by a South African court
(a) Whether the alleged offences may be adjudicated upon by a South African
court
The general principle of South African criminal jurisdiction is that courts ordinarily
exercise jurisdiction over offences committed within the territory of South Africa. This
territorial principle is subject to exceptions where legislation confers jurisdiction over
conduct committed outside the Republic.1 In S v Basson, the Constitutional Court
recognised that South African courts may exercise jurisdiction over offences committed
outside South Africa where a proper legal basis for such jurisdiction exists.2
The alleged conduct of X falls within the scope of the Regulation of Foreign Military
Assistance Act 15 of 1998 (“RFMA Act”). The Act regulates the provision of foreign
military assistance and mercenary activities by South African citizens and permanent
residents.3 Foreign military assistance includes military or military-related services and
security services provided in connection with armed conflict.4 X is alleged to have
provided mercenary services in assisting an attempted coup against the democratically
elected government of Zamunda. His alleged conduct may accordingly constitute an
offence under the RFMA Act.
Section 2 of the RFMA Act prohibits mercenary activity and applies to conduct occurring
within South Africa or elsewhere.5 Section 3 prohibits a person from offering or
1
S v Basson 2007 (3) SA 582 (CC) para 223.
2
Ibid.
3
Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act 15 of 1998.
4
Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act 15 of 1998 s 1.
5
Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act 15 of 1998 s 2.
DUE DATE: 31 AUGUST 2026
1. Whether X may be charged by a South African court
(a) Whether the alleged offences may be adjudicated upon by a South African
court
The general principle of South African criminal jurisdiction is that courts ordinarily
exercise jurisdiction over offences committed within the territory of South Africa. This
territorial principle is subject to exceptions where legislation confers jurisdiction over
conduct committed outside the Republic.1 In S v Basson, the Constitutional Court
recognised that South African courts may exercise jurisdiction over offences committed
outside South Africa where a proper legal basis for such jurisdiction exists.2
The alleged conduct of X falls within the scope of the Regulation of Foreign Military
Assistance Act 15 of 1998 (“RFMA Act”). The Act regulates the provision of foreign
military assistance and mercenary activities by South African citizens and permanent
residents.3 Foreign military assistance includes military or military-related services and
security services provided in connection with armed conflict.4 X is alleged to have
provided mercenary services in assisting an attempted coup against the democratically
elected government of Zamunda. His alleged conduct may accordingly constitute an
offence under the RFMA Act.
Section 2 of the RFMA Act prohibits mercenary activity and applies to conduct occurring
within South Africa or elsewhere.5 Section 3 prohibits a person from offering or
1
S v Basson 2007 (3) SA 582 (CC) para 223.
2
Ibid.
3
Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act 15 of 1998.
4
Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act 15 of 1998 s 1.
5
Regulation of Foreign Military Assistance Act 15 of 1998 s 2.