Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Exam (elaborations)

LEV3701 Assignment 2 2026 | Due 9 April 2026 - Distinction Guaranteed

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages

LEV3701 Assignment 2 2026 | Due 9 April 2026 - Distinction Guaranteed. logo Back Save Share Exam (elaborations) LEV3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 SEMESTER 1 2026 - DUE 9 April 2026 (DISTINCTON) 5,0 (3) Institution University Of South Africa (Unisa) Course Practising Workplace English (LEV3701) R75,00 Get access to the full document: Add to cart Purchased by 25 students Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again. Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Get to know the seller Seller avatar Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work. Falconntutors 4,3 (289) Rating 5,0 (3) Sold 25 Pages 5 Grade A+ Uploaded on Written in 2024/2025 LEV3701 Assignment 2 semester 1 2026 DUE 8 APRIL 2026 A final-year law student is charged with the alleged rape of a fellow student. During the trial, the victim testifies that the rape took place one night after a function, on a deserted part of the campus. She explains that she was involved in a serious wrestle with her assailant and identifies the accused as her attacker. During cross-examination, it is put to her that she is lying, because she couldn’t have observed the assailant’s identity properly. Question 1 Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 regulates the admissibility of evidence relating to the character of a complainant in sexual offence cases. Section 227(2) prohibits any evidence or cross-examination regarding the complainant’s previous sexual experience or conduct, except with the leave of the court or where such evidence has been introduced by the prosecution. The questions posed by the accused about the complainant’s sexual relations with other men directly fall within this prohibition. (See Learning Unit 10: Character Evidence) The accused would be required to make an application for leave to adduce such evidence. In determining the application, section 227(5) requires the court to consider factors including whether the evidence is in the interests of justice, fundamental to the

Content preview

LEV3701
ASSIGNMENT 2
DUE DATE: 9 APRIL 2026

, LEV3701 Assignment 2 2026
DUE 8 APRIL 2026


A final-year law student is charged with the alleged rape of a fellow student.
During the trial, the victim testifies that the rape took place one night after a
function, on a deserted part of the campus. She explains that she was involved in
a serious wrestle with her assailant and identifies the accused as her attacker.
During cross-examination, it is put to her that she is lying, because she couldn’t
have observed the assailant’s identity properly.




Question 1


Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 regulates the admissibility of
evidence relating to the character of a complainant in sexual offence cases. Section
227(2) prohibits any evidence or cross-examination regarding the complainant’s
previous sexual experience or conduct, except with the leave of the court or where such
evidence has been introduced by the prosecution. The questions posed by the accused
about the complainant’s sexual relations with other men directly fall within this
prohibition.


(See Learning Unit 10: Character Evidence)


The accused would be required to make an application for leave to adduce such
evidence. In determining the application, section 227(5) requires the court to consider
factors including whether the evidence is in the interests of justice, fundamental to the
accused’s defence, and not substantially outweighed by its potential prejudice to the
complainant’s dignity and right to privacy. Section 227(6) is a further, critical barrier: the
court shall not grant leave if the evidence is sought to support an inference that the
complainant is more likely to have consented or is less worthy of belief.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 1, 2026
Number of pages
5
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
UNIVIA
4,1
(53)
Sold
542
Followers
3
Items
783
Last sold
5 hours ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions