• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 16 pages
Exam (elaborations)

IRM1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE September 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 16 pages

IRM1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE September 2026; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... Ensure your success with us...... Zakumi learnt from her uncles that she will not inherit her late parent’s estate, which included a house. The basis for this decision was that she is a female and under customary law, only men can inherit from the estate. Since Zakumi was the only child, her uncles recommended Zakumi’s relative known as Thimbeza to inherit the estate. Zakumi approaches you for legal advice regarding the constitutionality of the customary law that excludes her only because she is a female. Discuss the relevant constitutional provisions and the case law. In your answer, indicate whether or not you are in favour of the customary law position

Content preview

IRM1501
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026
Unique number:
Due date: September 2026


2 DIFFERENT ANSWERS INLCUDED

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MALE PRIMOGENITURE IN CUSTOMARY
INTESTATE SUCCESSION

1. Introduction

Zakumi’s dispute concerns intestate succession under customary law and, more
specifically, the rule of male primogeniture. Under that traditional rule, succession
followed the senior male line, while women and girls were excluded from inheriting
family property merely because of their sex.1The rule would allow Thimbeza, as a
male relative, to inherit the deceased estate even though Zakumi is the deceased’s
only child.1The legal issue is whether this exclusion remains constitutionally valid
after the development of South African constitutional and succession law.

, 2 DIFFERENT ANSWERS INLCUDED

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MALE PRIMOGENITURE IN CUSTOMARY
INTESTATE SUCCESSION

1. Introduction

Zakumi’s dispute concerns intestate succession under customary law and, more
specifically, the rule of male primogeniture. Under that traditional rule, succession
followed the senior male line, while women and girls were excluded from inheriting
family property merely because of their sex.1The rule would allow Thimbeza, as a
male relative, to inherit the deceased estate even though Zakumi is the deceased’s
only child.2The legal issue is whether this exclusion remains constitutionally valid
after the development of South African constitutional and succession law.

The rule cannot presently be enforced against Zakumi. The constitutional protection
of equality and dignity, together with the decision in Bhe and Others v Khayelitsha
Magistrate and Others, changed the former customary-law position.3The material
further identifiesMthembu v Letsela and Another and M and Another v M and
Another as relevant decisions in the legal development surrounding primogeniture
and customary succession.4This essay argues that Zakumi may inherit her parent’s
estate and that her uncles cannot lawfully replace her with Thimbeza because she is
female.5

2. The customary-law principle of primogeniture

Primogeniture is a customary succession rule under which inheritance follows the
senior male line of the family.6The eldest son ordinarily inherits the deceased’s
estate, while the descendants of the senior male line may succeed where the eldest


1
C Rautenbach, NMI Goolam and JC Bekker, Introduction to Legal Pluralism (LexisNexis
2014) 121–122.
2
C Rautenbach, W Du Plessis and G Pienaar, ‘Is Primogeniture Extinct Like the Dodo, or Is
There Any Prospect of It Rising from the Ashes? Comments on the Evolution of Customary
Succession Laws in South Africa’ (2006) 22 South African Journal on Human Rights 99, 99–118.
3
Bhe and Others v Khayelitsha Magistrate and Others 2005 (1) SA 580 (CC).
4
Mthembu v Letsela and Another 2000 (3) All SA 219 (A); M and Another v M and Another
(63462/12) [2014] ZAGPPHC 1026.
5
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 s 9(1).
6
Rautenbach, Goolam and Bekker (n 1) 121.

Connected book
 image
Kirsty Williamson, Graeme Johanson Research Methods
Publisher: 2017 ISBN: 9780081022214 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
March 1, 2026
File latest updated on
July 25, 2026
Number of pages
16
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00
Purchased by 11 students

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal
4,2
(14448)
Sold
154658
Followers
36028
Items
5227
Last sold
2 hours ago

Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions