Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 5 pages
Exam (elaborations)

MRL2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE 24 August 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 5 pages

MRL2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE 24 August 2026; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us... Question 1 The main object of Abahlali (Pty) Ltd is manufacturing furniture. The Memorandum of Incorporation provides that the board of directors may appoint a managing director who will be authorised to enter into contracts on behalf of the company. Should the contract, however, exceed the amount of R150 000, prior consent of the general meeting is required. Gadifele, one of the directors, buys a beach house for R350 000 from Nawana on behalf of Abahlali (Pty) Ltd. Explain whether Abahlali (Pty) Ltd may rely on the limitations contained in its Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) regarding the company's capacity and authority to enter into contracts as a basis for avoiding liability under the contract. (800 words) Question 2 Thapelo is a member of Marang CC. He is the oldest of all the members and is concerned about his deteriorating health. He does not want to sell his member's interest since the corporation's business is doing very well.

Content preview

MRL2601
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026
Unique number:
Due date: 24 August 2026


Question 1

Abahlali (Pty) Ltd cannot avoid the contract merely because buying a beach house
falls outside its furniture manufacturing object. Under sections 19(1) and 20(1) of the
Companies Act 71 of 2008, a company has the legal capacity of an individual,
although its MOI may restrict its purposes, powers or activities. 1 An act is not void
only because the company lacked capacity under its MOI or because directors
lacked authority resulting from that restriction.1 Therefore, the object clause does not
make the purchase invalid.

Connected book
 image
Piet A. Delport New Entrepreneurial Law
Publisher: 2014 ISBN: 9780409122268 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
January 28, 2026
File latest updated on
August 24, 2026
Number of pages
5
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
R75,00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal
4,2
(14346)
Sold
153909
Followers
36023
Items
5116
Last sold
4 hours ago

Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions