Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

2021 PYC4804 Assignment 1 Answers with explanations

Rating
-
Sold
10
Pages
13
Uploaded on
03-03-2021
Written in
2020/2021

The following document I have compiled with possible answers to the 2021 assignment 1 tutorial letter for the module PYC4804. I hope this will help you learn more about the rating criteria!

Content preview

PYC4804
2021 ASSIGNMENT 01 ANSWERS WITH EXPLANATIONS




Arishka Maharaj

, ITEM 1
Which of the following statements are TRUE or FALSE?
‘It is possible to plan one’s daily activities despite changing circumstances.’
‘It is not possible to plan one’s daily activities because circumstances change.’

Agree Disagree

ANSWER

Item formulation:
Rate 4- The item is ambiguous as it asks the respondent to select which is true or false, but it provides
options reflecting “agree and disagree”. For this reason, the item is ambiguous. The item does not make
use of psychological jargon, it is not leading, not minimalist or socially desirable.

Grounded in theory (look at justification in your tut letter):
Rate 5- The theory the item is based on is correct, Rotter’s theory on locus of control. The item is
implemented correctly as it is correct to state that someone with an internal locus of control displays self
control over their circumstances and outcomes relative to those who are external locus of control driven
(are unable to display self control over their outcomes and circumstances). The item is operating correctly
as it correctly mentions that the item seeks to identify between two different types of people, those with an
internal locus of control and those with an external locus of control. Since the explanations and
identification is correct, the sub criterion is met.

Practical use:
Rate 1- Ambiguous items CANNOT be easy to answer to, Therefore the first criterion for practical use is
unmet. The level of ambiguity adds to confusion as to how to respond by questioning which box means
what. We do not bother looking at the rest of the practical use criterion once we know a rating of 1 is
required. Arishka Maharaj

Document information

Uploaded on
March 3, 2021
Number of pages
13
Written in
2020/2021
Type
OTHER
Person
Unknown
R150,00
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
arishkamaharaj8 University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
436
Member since
7 year
Number of followers
289
Documents
0
Last sold
2 months ago

3,9

89 reviews

5
36
4
27
3
15
2
6
1
5

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions