Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

Criminal law class notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Uploaded on
21-02-2021
Written in
2019/2020

Mental illness defence in criminal law, class notes

Institution
Course

Content preview

W4 C3 – MENTAL ILLNESS DEFENCES

1) “The defence of insanity pays insufficient attention to medical knowledge; the
defence of diminished responsibility pays too much.” Discuss.
(Prepare an essay outline, as you would in the exam.)
 INTRO:
o Include conclusion.
o Show the side you are picking overall.
o Context; i.e. for the question. Start by paraphrasing the question, e.g. discuss
any statute or cases or developments in the topic involved.
 DEFENCE OF INSANITY:
o HAVE A MINI CONCLUSION AT THE END OF EVERY PARA; EVALUATIONS
o 20 cases a year of insanity a year. Has to be proven by D on the balance of
probabilities.
o ‘A quagmire of law seldom entered nowadays save by those in desperate
need of some kind of defence… a quick backward look at the state of
medicine in 1843 will suffice to show how unreal it would be to apply the
concepts of that age to the present time’. (Lawton LJ in R v Quick).
o D’s mental capacities AT THE TIME of the offence,
o Special verdict: NOT GUILTY by REASON OF INSANITY.
o Infrequently used! Issues of stigma (Law Commission) stemming from the
word ‘insanity’.
o Limits of defence?
o Hospital admission, with or without a restriction order (approx. 40 percent).
o DEFECT OF REASON
o Defect of reason is narrow. It is a legal, not psychiatric meaning. It is
cognitive, not volitional or emotionally limitations.
o M’NAGHTEN:
o Defect of reason caused by disease of the mind which causes D
NOT TO KNOW THE NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ACT (profound
delusions/hallucinations) and also NOT TO KNOW THE ACT WAS WRONG:
Legal, not moral wrong.
IN THE ESSAY DISCUSS WHAT THE DISEASE OF THE MIND IS.
DISEASES OF THE MIND = diabetes or something else.
o R v Windle (1952), confirmed in Johnson (2008)
o In practice, a benign approach. Mackay et al (2006) where morality not
legality seems to count.
o Wrongness judged by the standards of reasonable ordinary people (CCC:
‘fudging’ morality and illegality).
o DISEASE OF THE MIND DEFINED IN BRATTY V AG FOR NI:
o Lord Denning at 412: ‘It seems to me that any mental disorder which has
manifested itself in violence and is prone to recur is a disease of the mind. At

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
February 21, 2021
Number of pages
4
Written in
2019/2020
Type
OTHER
Person
Unknown

Subjects

CA$15.15
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
enesztrk

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
enesztrk AQA
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
2
Documents
73
Last sold
10 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions