SOLUTION MANUAL x@
Modern Advanced Accounting In Canada,
x@ x@ x@ x@
10th Edition By Darrell Herauf, Chima
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
Mbagwu
Chapters 1 - 12, Complete
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
,
, Chapter1 @
x
Conceptual&Case Analysis Framewo rk @
x x
@ x
@ @
x x@
s for Financial Reporting x@ x@ x@
A brief description of the major points covered in each case and problem.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
CA SES x@
Case 1-1 x@
In this case, students are introduced to the difference in accounting for R&D costs
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
betwee nIFRS and ASPE and asked to provide arguments to support the differentSst
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
andards.
Case 1-2 x@ x @ (adapted from a case prepared by PeterSSecord, SaintSMary’s University)
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
In this real life case, students are asked to discuss the merits of historical costs vs. replac
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ement c osts. Actual note disclosure from a company’s financial statements is provided as
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
x@ background m aterial. x@ x@
Case 1-3 x@ x @ (adapted from a case prepared by Peter Secord, Saint Mary’s University)
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
, A Canadian companyShas just acquired a non-
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
controlling interest in a U.S. public company. It must decide whether to use IFRS orSU.S.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
GAAP f orSthe U.S. subsidiary. Financial statement information is provided under IFRS and
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x
@ U.S. GAAP. Th e reasons forSsome of the differences in numbers must be explained and
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
an opinion provided as to which method best reflects economic reality.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
Case 1-4 x@
This case is adapted from a CPA Canada case. A private company is planning to go publ
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ic. Analy sis and recommendations are required forSaccounting issues related to purchase
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
and installation ofSnewSinformation system, revenue recognition, convertible debentures an
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
d doubtfulaccounts receivable.
x@ x@
Case 1-5 x@
This case is adapted from a CPA Canada case.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x @ A private company is planning to trans
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ition fro m ASPE to IFRS. Analysis and recommendations are required forSaccounting iss
x@ x@ x@ x@ x @ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ues related to c onvertible debentures, unusual item, revenue recognition, contingency a
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
nd impairment.
x@
Modern Advanced Accounting In Canada,
x@ x@ x@ x@
10th Edition By Darrell Herauf, Chima
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
Mbagwu
Chapters 1 - 12, Complete
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
,
, Chapter1 @
x
Conceptual&Case Analysis Framewo rk @
x x
@ x
@ @
x x@
s for Financial Reporting x@ x@ x@
A brief description of the major points covered in each case and problem.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
CA SES x@
Case 1-1 x@
In this case, students are introduced to the difference in accounting for R&D costs
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
betwee nIFRS and ASPE and asked to provide arguments to support the differentSst
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
andards.
Case 1-2 x@ x @ (adapted from a case prepared by PeterSSecord, SaintSMary’s University)
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
In this real life case, students are asked to discuss the merits of historical costs vs. replac
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ement c osts. Actual note disclosure from a company’s financial statements is provided as
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
x@ background m aterial. x@ x@
Case 1-3 x@ x @ (adapted from a case prepared by Peter Secord, Saint Mary’s University)
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
, A Canadian companyShas just acquired a non-
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
controlling interest in a U.S. public company. It must decide whether to use IFRS orSU.S.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
GAAP f orSthe U.S. subsidiary. Financial statement information is provided under IFRS and
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x
@ U.S. GAAP. Th e reasons forSsome of the differences in numbers must be explained and
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
an opinion provided as to which method best reflects economic reality.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
Case 1-4 x@
This case is adapted from a CPA Canada case. A private company is planning to go publ
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ic. Analy sis and recommendations are required forSaccounting issues related to purchase
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
and installation ofSnewSinformation system, revenue recognition, convertible debentures an
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
d doubtfulaccounts receivable.
x@ x@
Case 1-5 x@
This case is adapted from a CPA Canada case.
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x @ A private company is planning to trans
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ition fro m ASPE to IFRS. Analysis and recommendations are required forSaccounting iss
x@ x@ x@ x@ x @ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
ues related to c onvertible debentures, unusual item, revenue recognition, contingency a
x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@ x@
nd impairment.
x@