100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary PSYC 355 – Social Psychology – USC – Final Exam Study Guide (A+ Student Notes)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
03-05-2025
Written in
2023/2024

These notes and summary helped me get an A in PSYC355 Finals at USC – and they can help you too! Midterm/final exam prep - Students who missed lectures - Simplifying complex topics - Quick revision & last-minute cramming

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
May 3, 2025
Number of pages
3
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Ch12 Law

Criminal Justice System: low percent go to trial, most accept a plea

Eyewitness Identification: error = wrongful accusation, influences by personal & environmental
Imperfect memories: high arousal, distance, intoxication
Weapons focus effect: attention away from the face to weapon
Cross race identification bias: better at identifying one’s own race and age group
Misinformation effect: wording, priming, stressed, suggestive procedures
Reconstruction: affected by the procedure, distinctiveness, emotions displayed, and stress
Familiarity-induced bias: remembers face but not circumstances
In courts: Jury overestimate accuracy, judge by confidence
Improving eyewitness justice: educate judges and juries, make identification more accurate
Alibi

Confession
Interviews: polygraph: cannot rely on alone, inaccurate
Interrogations: sensory discomfort, prolonged isolation, threat, deprivation of sleep, food, other
needs, sensory discomfort, physical violence
False confessions: 1) to escape stressful situations 2) internalization 3) leniency
In the courtroom: Juries powerfully influenced by confession, fundamental attribution error.
Pleading guilty to avoid taking risk of conviction

Jury Decision making
Jury selection: voir dire, peremptory challenges: stereotypes and confirmation bias/self-fulfilling
prophecy
Juror Bias: sympathy, strong defense because of a good lawyer, death penalty, overestimating
confidence of police...
Death qualification: more likely to vote guilty
Scientific Juror Selection: surveys, background, attitudes
Race: evidence weak, prefer those similar; evidence strong = harsher to the same race
Decision making: Non-evidentiary influence: exposure to pretrial stories, primacy effect, CSI
effect, doesn’t always follow judge’s instructions: jury nullification
Jury deliberation: hierarchy, 1) orientation 2) open conflict 3) reconciliation
Majority rules vs leniency bias

Post-trial
Sentencing disparities: from judge to judge; anchoring effect, too lenient, the goal of
imprisonment
Decision control & process control
Adversal model vs inquisitorial model
CA$7.09
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
yayashi

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
yayashi University Of Southern California
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
7 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
36
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions