100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

TEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by Goolsby

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
256
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
28-03-2025
Written in
2024/2025

TEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by GoolsbyTEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by GoolsbyTEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by GoolsbyTEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by GoolsbyTEST BANK FOR ADVANCED ASSESSMENT: INTERPRETING FINDINGS AND FORMULATING DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES 5th Edition by Goolsby

Show more Read less
Institution
Advanced Assessment: Interpreting Fi
Course
Advanced Assessment: Interpreting Fi











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Advanced Assessment: Interpreting Fi
Course
Advanced Assessment: Interpreting Fi

Document information

Uploaded on
March 28, 2025
Number of pages
256
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Test Bank for Advanced Assessment: Interpreting Findings and
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll




ll Formulating Differential Diagnoses, 5th Edition, Mary Jo
ll ll ll ll ll ll




ll Goolsby, Laurie Grubbs Chapter 1 - 22 | Complete
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll

,Chapter 1. Assessment and Clinical Decision-Making: Overview
ll ll ll ll ll ll




Multiple llChoice
Identify llthe llchoice llthat llbest llcompletes llthe llstatement llor llanswers llthe llquestion.

ll 1. Which lltype llof llclinical lldecision-making llis llmost llreliable?
A. Intuitive
B. Analytical
C. Experiential
D. Augenblick
ll 2. Which llof llthe llfollowing llis llfalse? llTo llobtain lladequate llhistory, llhealth-care llproviders llmust llbe:
A. Methodical lland llsystematic
B. Attentive llto llthe llpatient’s llverbal lland llnonverbal lllanguage
C. Able llto llaccurately llinterpret llthe llpatient’s llresponses
D. Adept llat llreading llinto llthe llpatient’s llstatements
ll 3. Essential llparts llof lla llhealth llhistory llinclude llall llof llthe llfollowing llexcept:
A. Chief llcomplaint
B. History llof llthe llpresent llillness
C. Current llvital llsigns
D. All llof llthe llabove llare llessential llhistory llcomponents
ll 4. Which llof llthe llfollowing llis llfalse? llWhile llperforming llthe llphysical llexamination, llthe llexaminer
llmust llbelable llto:

A. Differentiate llbetween llnormal lland llabnormal llfindings
B. Recall llknowledge llof lla llrange llof llconditions lland lltheir llassociated llsigns lland llsymptoms
C. Recognize llhow llcertain llconditions llaffect llthe llresponse llto llother llconditions
D. Foresee llunpredictable llfindings
ll 5. The llfollowing llis llthe llleast llreliable llsource llof llinformation llfor lldiagnostic llstatistics:
A. Evidence-based llinvestigations
B. Primary llreports llof llresearch
C. Estimation llbased llon lla llprovider’s llexperience
D. Published llmeta-analyses
ll 6. The llfollowing llcan llbe llused llto llassist llin llsound llclinical lldecision-making:
A. Algorithm llpublished llin lla llpeer-reviewed lljournal llarticle
B. Clinical llpractice llguidelines
C. Evidence-based llresearch
D. All llof llthe llabove
ll 7. If lla lldiagnostic llstudy llhas llhigh llsensitivity, llthis llindicates lla:
A. High llpercentage llof llpersons llwith llthe llgiven llcondition llwill llhave llan llabnormal llresult
B. Low llpercentage llof llpersons llwith llthe llgiven llcondition llwill llhave llan llabnormal llresult
C. Low lllikelihood llof llnormal llresult llin llpersons llwithout lla llgiven llcondition
D. None llof llthe llabove

,ll 8. If lla lldiagnostic llstudy llhas llhigh llspecificity, llthis llindicates lla:
A. Low llpercentage llof llhealthy llindividuals llwill llshow lla llnormal llresult
B. High llpercentage llof llhealthy llindividuals llwill llshow lla llnormal llresult
C. High llpercentage llof llindividuals llwith lla lldisorder llwill llshow lla llnormal llresult
D. Low llpercentage llof llindividuals llwith lla lldisorder llwill llshow llan llabnormal llresult
ll 9. A lllikelihood llratio llabove ll1 llindicates llthat lla lldiagnostic lltest llshowing lla:
A. Positive llresult llis llstrongly llassociated llwith llthe lldisease
B. Negative llresult llis llstrongly llassociated llwith llabsence llof llthe lldisease
C. Positive llresult llis llweakly llassociated llwith llthe lldisease
D. Negative llresult llis llweakly llassociated llwith llabsence llof llthe lldisease
ll 10. llWhich llof llthe llfollowing llclinical llreasoning lltools llis lldefined llas llevidence-based llresource llbased
llon llmathematical llmodeling llto llexpress llthe lllikelihood llof lla llcondition llin llselect llsituations,

llsettings, lland/orlpatients?

A. Clinical llpractice llguideline
B. Clinical lldecision llrule
C. Clinical llalgorithm
D. Clinical llrecommendation

, Chapter 1. Assessment and Clinical Decision-Making:
ll ll ll ll ll

Overview
Answer
ll Sectionll




MULTIPLE llCHOICE

1. ANS: l l B
Croskerry ll(2009) lldescribes lltwo llmajor lltypes llof llclinical lldiagnostic lldecision-making: llintuitive
lland llanalytical. llIntuitive lldecision-making ll(similar llto llAugenblink lldecision-making) llis llbased

llon llthe llexperience lland llintuition llof llthe llclinician lland llis llless llreliable lland llpaired llwith llfairly

llcommon llerrors. llIn llcontrast, llanalytical lldecision-making llis llbased llon llcareful llconsideration

lland llhas llgreater llreliabilitylwith llrare llerrors.




PTS: 1
2. ANS: l l D
To llobtain lladequate llhistory, llproviders llmust llbe llwell llorganized, llattentive llto llthe llpatient’s llverbal
llandlnonverbal lllanguage, lland llable llto llaccurately llinterpret llthe llpatient’s llresponses llto llquestions.

llRather llthan llreading llinto llthe llpatient’s llstatements, llthey llclarify llany llareas llof lluncertainty.




PTS: 1
3. ANS: l l C
Vital llsigns llare llpart llof llthe llphysical llexamination llportion llof llpatient llassessment, llnot llpart llof llthe
llhealthlhistory.




PTS: 1
4. ANS: l l D
While llperforming llthe llphysical llexamination, llthe llexaminer llmust llbe llable llto lldifferentiate
llbetweenlnormal lland llabnormal llfindings, llrecall llknowledge llof lla llrange llof llconditions, llincluding

lltheir llassociated llsigns lland llsymptoms, llrecognize llhow llcertain llconditions llaffect llthe llresponse

llto llother llconditions, lland lldistinguish llthe llrelevance llof llvaried llabnormal llfindings.




PTS: 1
5. ANS: l l C
Sources llfor lldiagnostic llstatistics llinclude lltextbooks, llprimary llreports llof llresearch, lland
llpublished llmeta-analyses. llAnother llsource llof llstatistics, llthe llone llthat llhas llbeen llmost llwidely

llused lland llavailable llfor llapplication llto llthe llreasoning llprocess, llis llthe llestimation llbased llon lla

llprovider’s llexperience, llalthough llthese llare llrarely llaccurate. llOver llthe llpast lldecade, llthe

llavailability llof llevidence llon llwhich llto llbase llclinical llreasoning llis llimproving, lland llthere llis llan

llincreasing llexpectation llthat llclinical llreasoninglbe ll based llon llscientific llevidence. llEvidence-

based llstatistics llare llalso llincreasingly llbeing llused llto lldevelop llresources llto llfacilitate llclinical
lldecision-making.




PTS: 1
6. ANS: l l D
To llassist llin llclinical lldecision-making, lla llnumber llof llevidence-based llresources llhave llbeen
lldevelopedlto llassist llthe llclinician. llResources, llsuch llas llalgorithms lland llclinical llpractice

llguidelines, llassist llin llclinical llreasoning llwhen llproperly llapplied.




This llstudy llsource llwas lldownloaded llby ll100000826342158 llfrom llCourseHero.com llon ll05-25-2021 ll21:32:19 llGMT ll-05:00


https://www.coursehero.com/file/21739484/c1/
Downloaded llby: llStuviaaa ll|




Distribution llof llthis lldocument llis llillegal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ACADEMICSUCCESS stuvia
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
44
Member since
9 months
Number of followers
3
Documents
5076
Last sold
1 week ago
STUDY HUB

WELCOME TO MY STUDY HUB ! I CREAT CLEAR CONCISE, AND EXAM-FOCUSED NOTES DESIGNED TO SAVE YOUR TIME AND BOOST YOUR GRADES .EVERY DOCUMENT IS CRAFTED FROM VERIFIED COURSE MATERIALS , STRUCTURED FOR EASY UNDERSTANDING, AND OPTIMIZED FOR QUICK REVISION . IF YOU WANT RELIABLE ,HIGH QUALITY RESOURCES THAT ACTUALLY HELP YOU SCORE HIGHER , YOU'RE IN THE RIGHT PLACE !"

4.3

24 reviews

5
18
4
2
3
0
2
1
1
3

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions