Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
Other

NR 716 Week 3 Discussion; The Practice Question - Obesity

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages

NR 716 Week 3 Discussion; The Practice Question - Obesity

Content preview

NR 716
Week 3 Discussion
Hi Dr. Jennings,


My practice question is in families with children, does implementing the healthy Home
Offerings via the Mealtime Environment (HOME) Plus Program compared to standard mealtime
practices impact nutrition-related outcomes and behavior over the course of the next 8-10
weeks? (Fulkerson et al., 2018).


As obesity continues to be considered a serious costly, epidemic concern in adults and
children (CDC, 2022). It is important to continue to work together to approach this problem
that requires attention in creating an environment that supports healthy lifestyles. Working as
a team and sharing the responsibility of recognizing what the gap is will further assist in
improving the problem (Leach & Tucker, 2018). The evidence-based interventions from the
study considered various factors associated with creating healthful home food environments,
promoting positive shopping, and eating behaviors, reducing screen time, and enhancing self-
efficacy in creating healthy family meals. The patient population included 160 children aged 8-
12 years, their parents; 81 parents were randomized to intervention and 79 parents were the
control group.


The outcome demonstrated that intervention parents had greater improvement over
time in their scores of self-efficacies for identifying appropriate portion sizes compared to
control parents. This improvement was statistically significant, with adjusted means showing
significant differences at both post-intervention (P=0.002) and follow-up (P=0.01). This suggests
that the intervention had a positive impact on parents' ability to accurately determine
appropriate portion sizes for their children. The intervention children were less likely to
consume at least one sugar- sweetened beverage daily at post-intervention compared to
control children. This difference was statistically significant (P=0.04), indicating that the
intervention had a beneficial effect on reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption
among children.

Document information

Study
Unknown
Uploaded on
March 16, 2025
Number of pages
2
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
CA$22.76

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
studyguider55
3.9
(122)
Sold
455
Followers
313
Items
1565
Last sold
1 month ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions