Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
Other

NR 716 Week 2 Discussion; Synthesis - Chronic heart failure

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages

NR 716 Week 2 Discussion; Synthesis - Chronic heart failure

Content preview

Select one of the following options for your initial discussion post.
Using the two research studies you appraised in NR715 and the one randomized control or
quasi-experimental study you identified in Week 1 for the selected practice problem, write
one paragraph where you apply the concepts of a synthesis. Using these three research
studies and three non-research evidence sources, write sentences where you apply the
concepts of synthesizing across research and non-research evidence in the same sentence.
Option 1: Use a synthesis of research study evidence and non-research evidence to write an
introduction to your practice problem: Requirements include that you introduce the practice
problem using a synthesis of research and non-research evidence and introduce an evidence-based
intervention using research evidence | On paragraph
Option 2: Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence to write an analysis of
the practice problem that include the significance, prevalence,
mortality, and economic ramifications of the problem at the national level | one paragraph.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Students
Resources Centre program page:

Answer:
Chronic heart failure is a progressive illness with recurring exacerbations, vagueness in the
illness pathway, and an extraordinary symptom burden that can lead to frequent interruptions in
the quality of life (Im et al., 2019). 6.7 million Americans greater than twenty years old have
heart failure, and prevalence is expected to rise to 8.5 million Americans by 2030 (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The incidence of heart failure ranges widely from 1 to
9 cases per 1000 person-years with an incidence and known stability in patients 55 years old or
less and 85 years old or greater (Groenewegen et al., 2020). Ongoing social support from
providers would buffer patients' stress and promote treatment adherence and a healthy lifestyle
to preserve quality of life. The occurrence of obesity, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and
coronary disease are modifiable risk factors. Prevention is the most effective strategy for
avoiding mortality and morbidity from heart failure. Several research studies have been
conducted to preserve the quality of life in patients with heart failure. The central theme is the
challenges that arise from patient self-management of heart failure and poor support from
providers (Mohammadi et al., 2021; Pereira Sousa et al.,2021; Wali et al., 2020). A
commonality identified within all three studies showed improvement in patient self-care
management through daily weight and restricting fluid intake, willingness to utilize technology
as an educational program with a patient teach-back method, and provision of support from
providers (Mohammadi et al., 2021; Pereira Sousa et al.,2021; Wali et al., 2020). Poor self-care
management with a lack of patient support from providers is standard among heart failure
patients; therefore, the initiation of support and ongoing education is significant after discharge
(Mohammadi et al., 2021; Pereira Sousa et al.,2021; Wali et al., 2020). Mohammadi et al.
(2021) discuss the benefit of providing support to patients from a web-based standpoint by
educating and allowing them to voice understanding through the teach-back method. Pereira et
al. (2021) tested the impact of long-term education through a program led by nurses to support
patients by self-recording daily weights and reducing fluid retention by restricting the intake of
fluids. Wali et al. (2020) discussed the challenges that the elderly face from heart failure and

Document information

Study
Unknown
Uploaded on
March 16, 2025
Number of pages
3
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
CA$22.75

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
studyguider55
3.9
(122)
Sold
455
Followers
313
Items
1565
Last sold
1 month ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions