Presenter Notes
14:52:42
-------------------------
Hello. I am ………
presenting the pr
pressure injuries
environment. As
Perioperative Ser
healthcare organ
pride ourselves in
patient care. With
on the prevention
injuries and infec
practice problem
the top four safe
Pressure Ulcers and the
catheter-associat
infections (CAUTI
associated bloods
(CLABSIs), and su
Perioperative Environment
(SSIs). Pressure u
common in vario
have been associ
treatment costs a
outcomes (Black,
2014). Recently,
emphasis on the
acquired pressure
hospital-acquired
(HAPUs) for surgi
undergoing lengt
procedures. As a
Practice (DNP) sc
NR 706: Week 6 Practice Problem Analysis Assignment for best clinical p
and published lite
synthesized in or
rising incidence o
DNP scholars are
organizational cu
gathering and tra
information to be
Dr. E. Hunt setting (Beeber, P
& Jones, 2019). E
studies aid the D
processes and en
guidelines to pos
healthcare quality
following present
evidence-based l
T question that fo
, Presente
2022-05-1
----------
--
The PIC
Practice Problem
addres
experie
of surg
(Patien
Identification
effectiv
tools,
module
PICO-T Question:
compa
PICO-T Components: educat
(Comp
In patients experiencing over two future
P (Patient/Population)- Patients
(Outco
hours of surgical time, how effective (Time)
experiencing over two hours of su
will be
are guidelines, tools, and analyzi
time studies
educational modules, compared pressu
suppor
with only education modules in measu
reducing the future risk of pressure I (Intervention)- Guidelines,
injuries over eight weeks? tools, and educational modules
C (Comparison)- Educational
modules
O (Outcome)- Reducing the future
risk of pressure injuries
T (Time)- Eight weeks
, Presente
Research Evidence 2022-05-1
----------
--
• Hultin, Karlsson, Ohrvall, & Gunningberg The pr
acquire
conducted a qualitative content analysis continu
clinical
structured interviews organiz
strugg
and co
• Sample: Thirty-one orthopedic surgic the inp
surgica
that were 65 years and older moved
reporte
• Findings: during
signific
• Patient knowledge and education increa
(Assoc
Registe
Backgroun patient participation in pressure injury p
• Continuous Bedside Pressure Mapping
Specto
and St
that th
d&
of all
encouraged checks and repositioning by
develo
staff pressu
approx
• Pressure injury information should be in
Significanc
thousa
USD) p
and clearly communicated for com
attribu
• Authors found that participants who we
e
hospita
study b
ample time and interaction with healthc
stated
retained information and practiced prev
approx
percen
measures major h
to surg
• Conclusion: additio
that th
• Increased interaction and communicatio
pressu
that ar
healthcare provider to the patient, incre
six per
patient
participation and engagement increas
percen
Ohrval
(2019)
qualita
with se
14:52:42
-------------------------
Hello. I am ………
presenting the pr
pressure injuries
environment. As
Perioperative Ser
healthcare organ
pride ourselves in
patient care. With
on the prevention
injuries and infec
practice problem
the top four safe
Pressure Ulcers and the
catheter-associat
infections (CAUTI
associated bloods
(CLABSIs), and su
Perioperative Environment
(SSIs). Pressure u
common in vario
have been associ
treatment costs a
outcomes (Black,
2014). Recently,
emphasis on the
acquired pressure
hospital-acquired
(HAPUs) for surgi
undergoing lengt
procedures. As a
Practice (DNP) sc
NR 706: Week 6 Practice Problem Analysis Assignment for best clinical p
and published lite
synthesized in or
rising incidence o
DNP scholars are
organizational cu
gathering and tra
information to be
Dr. E. Hunt setting (Beeber, P
& Jones, 2019). E
studies aid the D
processes and en
guidelines to pos
healthcare quality
following present
evidence-based l
T question that fo
, Presente
2022-05-1
----------
--
The PIC
Practice Problem
addres
experie
of surg
(Patien
Identification
effectiv
tools,
module
PICO-T Question:
compa
PICO-T Components: educat
(Comp
In patients experiencing over two future
P (Patient/Population)- Patients
(Outco
hours of surgical time, how effective (Time)
experiencing over two hours of su
will be
are guidelines, tools, and analyzi
time studies
educational modules, compared pressu
suppor
with only education modules in measu
reducing the future risk of pressure I (Intervention)- Guidelines,
injuries over eight weeks? tools, and educational modules
C (Comparison)- Educational
modules
O (Outcome)- Reducing the future
risk of pressure injuries
T (Time)- Eight weeks
, Presente
Research Evidence 2022-05-1
----------
--
• Hultin, Karlsson, Ohrvall, & Gunningberg The pr
acquire
conducted a qualitative content analysis continu
clinical
structured interviews organiz
strugg
and co
• Sample: Thirty-one orthopedic surgic the inp
surgica
that were 65 years and older moved
reporte
• Findings: during
signific
• Patient knowledge and education increa
(Assoc
Registe
Backgroun patient participation in pressure injury p
• Continuous Bedside Pressure Mapping
Specto
and St
that th
d&
of all
encouraged checks and repositioning by
develo
staff pressu
approx
• Pressure injury information should be in
Significanc
thousa
USD) p
and clearly communicated for com
attribu
• Authors found that participants who we
e
hospita
study b
ample time and interaction with healthc
stated
retained information and practiced prev
approx
percen
measures major h
to surg
• Conclusion: additio
that th
• Increased interaction and communicatio
pressu
that ar
healthcare provider to the patient, incre
six per
patient
participation and engagement increas
percen
Ohrval
(2019)
qualita
with se
