100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Automatism Scenario Plan

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
28-07-2024
Written in
2023/2024

A clearly structured automatism scenario plan. Used for WJEC exam but applicable for other exam boards. Cases are included. A* standard.

Institution
Course








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
July 28, 2024
Number of pages
2
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Automatism

 Applicable if D’s act was encouraged by an external cause.
 Defined in the case of Bratty v AG for Northern Ireland as “an act
done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such
as a spasm, a reflex action or convulsion; or an act done by
a person who is not conscious of what he is doing such as an
act done whilst suffering from concussion or whilst
sleepwalking.
 In the Hill v Baxter, a plea of automatism was successful where the
D had been attacked by a swarm of bees.

Actions must be completely involuntary

 AG’s Reference (No. 2 of 1992) – Lorry driver crashed into some cars
on the hard shoulder. He raised the defence of automatism on the
basis that he was ‘driving without awareness’ induced by repetitive
visual stimulus. The defence was not available because reduced or
impaired control is not enough for a defence of automatism. There
must be a ‘total destruction of voluntary control’.

The cause must be external

 R v Wholley – D sneezed causing him to lose control of his steering.
His lorry bumped into the car in front which in turn led to a domino
crash between 7 cars ahead of him. Automatism was allowed
because the attack of sneezing amount to an involuntary action.
 R v T – D was raped and suffered PTSD. Due to this, she committed
a crime. Exceptional stress can be an external factor that can
cause automatism.

Is it likely that D will be able to use the defence?

 The defence of automatism has been known to have rather
harsh application on times.
 In Broome v Perkins, D was in a hyperglycaemic state and drove
home from work erratically, causing significant damage to his car.
He could remember nothing about the journey, but the court held
that because it was a familiar journey, someone in his state should
have been able to get home safely. He could not use the defence.

Self-Induced Automatism

 If D knowingly puts themself in a position of automatism,
then the defence will fail.
 Bailey – D was a diabetic who failed to eat enough after taking
insulin. D became aggressive and hit V over the head with an iron
CA$6.66
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
eleanortrend

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
eleanortrend A Level Notes
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
21
Last sold
7 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions