PHIL 235 Quiz 4 Questions and Answers 2023
with complete solution
QUIZ 4
Question 1: The Nuremberg Code (followed by the Declaration of Helsinki) resulted from
inquiries into what happened in Nazi Germany in terms of research with human subjects.
True
False
Question 2: According to Laura Purdy, the possibility that high-risk pregnancies can be
detected prior to conception is irrelevant since there is a fundamental right to have children
regardless of the risks.
True
False
Question 3: The case of Halushka v. University of Saskatchewan established in Canadian Law
that in cases of determining how much information needs to be provided in a non-therapeutic
setting, researchers must use the test of “what the reasonable person would want to know.”
True
False
Question 4: According to Leon Kass, the debate about genetic screening and pre-natal
diagnosis cannot be detached from the ongoing debate regarding abortion.
True
False
Question 5: For Baylis and Robert, despite the serious moral issues related to “genetic
enhancement,” this
direction is inevitable and we should work to ensure that we develop new genetic technologies in
the most ethical way possible.
True
False
In this unit, we read about two very famous cases of unethical medical experimentation, the
Tuskegee Study and the research conducted by Dr. Ewen Cameron. Choose ONE of these two
examples. Give a brief description of the case and indicate what ethical issues the case reveals.
The Tuskegee study was an experiment examining African American men who were diagnosed
with syphilis, the study ran the course of 40 years. For the most part, the men were poor and
uneducated, they became part of the trial for treatment of bad blood. It is assumed that the men
agreed to participate with the promise of free medical care and meals during the visits. During
the trial, the researchers discovered that penicillin cures syphilis, however they did not tell the
participants. They also neglected to tell them that syphilis is a spreadable disease.
The US Public Health Servants, who conducted the study, should have advised the men about
this new evidence, but they neglected to do so. Because of this trial, the FDA reassessed its
with complete solution
QUIZ 4
Question 1: The Nuremberg Code (followed by the Declaration of Helsinki) resulted from
inquiries into what happened in Nazi Germany in terms of research with human subjects.
True
False
Question 2: According to Laura Purdy, the possibility that high-risk pregnancies can be
detected prior to conception is irrelevant since there is a fundamental right to have children
regardless of the risks.
True
False
Question 3: The case of Halushka v. University of Saskatchewan established in Canadian Law
that in cases of determining how much information needs to be provided in a non-therapeutic
setting, researchers must use the test of “what the reasonable person would want to know.”
True
False
Question 4: According to Leon Kass, the debate about genetic screening and pre-natal
diagnosis cannot be detached from the ongoing debate regarding abortion.
True
False
Question 5: For Baylis and Robert, despite the serious moral issues related to “genetic
enhancement,” this
direction is inevitable and we should work to ensure that we develop new genetic technologies in
the most ethical way possible.
True
False
In this unit, we read about two very famous cases of unethical medical experimentation, the
Tuskegee Study and the research conducted by Dr. Ewen Cameron. Choose ONE of these two
examples. Give a brief description of the case and indicate what ethical issues the case reveals.
The Tuskegee study was an experiment examining African American men who were diagnosed
with syphilis, the study ran the course of 40 years. For the most part, the men were poor and
uneducated, they became part of the trial for treatment of bad blood. It is assumed that the men
agreed to participate with the promise of free medical care and meals during the visits. During
the trial, the researchers discovered that penicillin cures syphilis, however they did not tell the
participants. They also neglected to tell them that syphilis is a spreadable disease.
The US Public Health Servants, who conducted the study, should have advised the men about
this new evidence, but they neglected to do so. Because of this trial, the FDA reassessed its
